Skip to content

feat(agentcfg): append-only agent config revision store (7/15) - #475

Merged
gusfcarvalho merged 2 commits into
lisa/agent-config/06-sdk-clientfrom
lisa/agent-config/07-revision-store
Oct 6, 2026
Merged

gusfcarvalho merged 2 commits into
lisa/agent-config/06-sdk-clientfrom
lisa/agent-config/07-revision-store

Conversation

@ccf-lisa

@ccf-lisa ccf-lisa Bot commented Oct 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Part 7/15 of the agent remote-configuration stack

This stack splits #465 into reviewable layers of at most ~1000 changed lines each (counted without docs/, go.sum and Markdown). The last layer's tree is identical to #465, which already has its review history.

Stacked on #474 (lisa/agent-config/06-sdk-client). Review and merge in order.

What's in this layer

Seventh layer of the agent remote-configuration stack (split from #465): the ccf_agent_config_revisions model (append-only hooks, unique (agent, revision)), migrations, the CCF_AGENT_* settings, and the agentcfg service's revision API: Current, GetRevision, ListRevisions (paginated) and CreateRevision (agent-row lock, optimistic expected revision), plus DeleteRevisionsForAgent for agent deletion.

Size: +766 -0 = 766 changed lines (without docs/go.sum).

Verification

Each layer builds on its own: go build, go vet (also with -tags integration), golangci-lint run and go test ./... pass, and make swag leaves the tree clean. Integration suites for the packages this layer touches pass locally on testcontainers Postgres.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: c09e2635-4c6a-4a2f-9a8b-20d0e2287c5b

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@gusfcarvalho gusfcarvalho left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ccf-review: APPROVE

1 Should-fix.

Stack (gh stack 484): #469 → #470 → #471 → #472 → #473 → #474 → #475 → #476 → #477 → #478 → #479 → #480 → #481 → #482 → #483

Comment thread internal/config/agents.go
ccf-lisa Bot and others added 2 commits October 6, 2026 09:09
Seventh layer of the agent remote-configuration stack (split from #465): the ccf_agent_config_revisions model (append-only hooks, unique (agent, revision)), migrations, the CCF_AGENT_* settings, and the agentcfg service's revision API: Current, GetRevision, ListRevisions (paginated) and CreateRevision (agent-row lock, optimistic expected revision), plus DeleteRevisionsForAgent for agent deletion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ccf-lisa
ccf-lisa Bot force-pushed the lisa/agent-config/07-revision-store branch from ddb5835 to 8422a9c Compare October 6, 2026 13:06

@gusfcarvalho gusfcarvalho left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ccf-review: APPROVE

no findings.

Stack (gh stack 484): #469 → #470 → #471 → #472 → #473 → #474 → #475 → #476 → #477 → #478 → #479 → #480 → #481 → #482 → #483

@gusfcarvalho
gusfcarvalho merged commit a148dd3 into main Oct 6, 2026
9 checks passed
@gusfcarvalho
gusfcarvalho deleted the lisa/agent-config/07-revision-store branch October 6, 2026 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant