Skip to content

OLS-3205: Remove multi-image console selection and use single image -operator#1705

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
blublinsky:operator-console-multi-image
Jun 18, 2026
Merged

OLS-3205: Remove multi-image console selection and use single image -operator#1705
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
blublinsky:operator-console-multi-image

Conversation

@blublinsky

@blublinsky blublinsky commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary
Deploy a single console plugin image from the operator instead of selecting among three images based on OCP minor version. The unified console image handles UI variant selection at runtime (see companion OLS-3205 for OCP_VERSION env).

  • Remove --console-image-pf5 and --console-image-4-19 CLI flags
  • Remove OCP minor version branching that chose pf5 / 4-19 / default images
  • Simplify overrideImages() and defaultImages to a single console image
  • Remove unused ConsoleUIImagePF5Default and ConsoleUIImage419Default constants

Operator-only PR. A companion bundle PR is required before release to remove obsolete deployment args (--console-image-pf5, --console-image-4-19) and pf5/419 entries from related_images.json / CSV relatedImages. Installing this operator build with the current CSV will fail until that bundle PR lands.

Type of change

  • [ x] Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up dependent library

Related Tickets & Documents

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • PR has passed all pre-merge test jobs.
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Testing

  • Please provide detailed steps to perform tests related to this code change.
  • How were the fix/results from this change verified? Please provide relevant screenshots or results.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated console plugin configuration docs to reflect a simplified model using a single, fixed console plugin image selected at startup.
  • Refactor
    • Simplified console image handling to rely on one --console-image flag (removing prior version/PF-specific console image options).
  • Chores
    • Updated default deployment patch/image placeholders to align with the new single console plugin image approach.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 10, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: This pull request references OLS-3205 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Summary
Deploy a single console plugin image from the operator instead of selecting among three images based on OCP minor version. The unified console image handles UI variant selection at runtime (see companion OLS-3205 for OCP_VERSION env).

  • Remove --console-image-pf5 and --console-image-4-19 CLI flags
  • Remove OCP minor version branching that chose pf5 / 4-19 / default images
  • Simplify overrideImages() and defaultImages to a single console image
  • Remove unused ConsoleUIImagePF5Default and ConsoleUIImage419Default constants

Operator-only PR. A companion bundle PR is required before release to remove obsolete deployment args (--console-image-pf5, --console-image-4-19) and pf5/419 entries from related_images.json / CSV relatedImages. Installing this operator build with the current CSV will fail until that bundle PR lands.

Type of change

  • [ x] Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up dependent library

Related Tickets & Documents

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • PR has passed all pre-merge test jobs.
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Testing

  • Please provide detailed steps to perform tests related to this code change.
  • How were the fix/results from this change verified? Please provide relevant screenshots or results.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 35bf3653-2b1e-4453-a1c8-9cd1791198eb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5a7b2a and fac0a75.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .ai/spec/what/console-ui.md
  • .ai/spec/what/system-overview.md
  • cmd/main.go
  • config/default/deployment-patch.yaml
  • hack/image_placeholders.json
  • internal/controller/utils/constants.go
  • internal/controller/utils/utils.go
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • hack/image_placeholders.json
  • internal/controller/utils/constants.go
  • config/default/deployment-patch.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • internal/controller/utils/utils.go
  • .ai/spec/what/console-ui.md
  • .ai/spec/what/system-overview.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • cmd/main.go

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR simplifies console plugin image selection by removing PatternFly-version-specific logic. The operator now deploys a single console image via --console-image, using OpenShift version detection only to set OCP_VERSION for runtime UI library selection rather than image branching.

Changes

Simplify console image selection model

Layer / File(s) Summary
Specification of simplified console deployment model
.ai/spec/what/console-ui.md, .ai/spec/what/system-overview.md
Specification and system overview docs updated to describe a single console plugin image configured via --console-image, with OpenShift version detection only for runtime OCP_VERSION environment variable, removing prior per-version image selection.
Default image constants cleanup
internal/controller/utils/constants.go
Removed exported console image default variables ConsoleUIImagePF5Default and ConsoleUIImage419Default.
Operator startup logic simplification
cmd/main.go
Simplified startup logic to remove OpenShift minor version detection for console image selection: removed PF5 and 4.19 default images, simplified overrideImages helper to accept only consoleImage, removed console-image-pf5 and console-image-4-19 command-line flags, deleted version-based image selection logic, and updated reconciler to use resolved console-plugin image directly.
Deployment patch and placeholder updates
config/default/deployment-patch.yaml, hack/image_placeholders.json
Updated deployment patch to replace version-specific console image args with single --console-image placeholder and added new image args for PostgreSQL, OpenShift MCP server, Dataverse exporter, and OCP RAG; removed version-specific placeholder configurations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • openshift/lightspeed-operator#1691: Updates bundled ClusterServiceVersion image digests for console plugin PF5 and 4-19 variants that are removed from operator flags and defaults in this PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • xrajesh
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 66.67% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: removing multi-image console selection logic and consolidating to a single image approach in the operator.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from raptorsun and xrajesh June 10, 2026 11:56
@raptorsun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

where we select the console image to use in this PR?

@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

where we select the console image to use in this PR?

According to the ticket its up to UI to do this. We tell it which OS version it is running on, and it does the magic https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OLS-3210

@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override "ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21"
this is an expected error as flags are removed

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: Overrode contexts on behalf of blublinsky: ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21

Details

In response to this:

/override "ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21"
this is an expected error as flags are removed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@blublinsky blublinsky force-pushed the operator-console-multi-image branch from c6b9ad2 to 63b3c2e Compare June 10, 2026 18:02
@raptorsun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 11, 2026
@blublinsky blublinsky force-pushed the operator-console-multi-image branch from 63b3c2e to c5a7b2a Compare June 12, 2026 07:44
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2026

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
cmd/main.go (2)

181-186: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift

Block merge until the shipped manifests stop passing the removed console-image flags.

This binary no longer accepts --console-image-pf5 / --console-image-4-19, and the PR notes say the current CSV still passes obsolete args. That leaves the shipped operator unable to start until config/manager/ and bundle/manifests/ are updated in lockstep.

As per coding guidelines, cmd/**/*.go: "New flags should be reflected in deployment/CSV args under config/manager/ and bundle/manifests/ when they affect the shipped operator."

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@cmd/main.go` around lines 181 - 186, The PR removes old flags
(console-image-pf5 / console-image-4-19) and introduces the new flag bound to
variable consoleImage via flag.StringVar("--console-image", ...); before
merging, update the shipped operator manifests so the deployment/CSV no longer
pass the removed flags and instead pass the new --console-image arg (or omit if
not needed). Specifically, update the operator args in config/manager/ and
bundle/manifests/ (CSV/deployment templates) to match the flag names used in
cmd/main.go (consoleImage / --console-image) and remove any references to
console-image-pf5 and console-image-4-19 so the running operator’s command-line
matches the code.

Source: Coding guidelines


301-305: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Fix missing OpenShift version env wiring in console pod (OCP_VERSION)

  • internal/controller/console/deployment.go sets the console container Env to utils.GetProxyEnvVars() only, with no additional env var appended for OpenShift major/minor.
  • internal/controller/utils/utils.go:GetProxyEnvVars() only forwards proxy env vars (HTTPS_PROXY/HTTP_PROXY/NO_PROXY variants) and there are no repo hits for OCP_VERSION (or similar OpenShift version env var names).
  • cmd/main.go detects OpenShift major/minor, but that information is not injected into the console container environment anywhere in the console deployment code.

Inject OCP_VERSION=<major>.<minor> into the console container env (if the documented fallback requires it), or update the docs/selection logic to match the actual mechanism (e.g., versioned image selection instead of env fallback).

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@cmd/main.go` around lines 301 - 305, cmd/main.go computes OpenShift
major/minor but never wires it into the console Pod env; update the controller
wiring so the computed ocpVersion (fmt.Sprintf("%d.%d", major, minor)) is passed
into the console controller initialization and used when building the container
Env in internal/controller/console/deployment.go (append an
EnvVar{Name:"OCP_VERSION", Value: ocpVersion} to the slice returned by
utils.GetProxyEnvVars()); keep utils.GetProxyEnvVars() as-is and ensure the
controller constructor (the function you call from cmd/main.go to
create/register the console reconciler) accepts the ocpVersion string and
forwards it to the deployment builder.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Outside diff comments:
In `@cmd/main.go`:
- Around line 181-186: The PR removes old flags (console-image-pf5 /
console-image-4-19) and introduces the new flag bound to variable consoleImage
via flag.StringVar("--console-image", ...); before merging, update the shipped
operator manifests so the deployment/CSV no longer pass the removed flags and
instead pass the new --console-image arg (or omit if not needed). Specifically,
update the operator args in config/manager/ and bundle/manifests/
(CSV/deployment templates) to match the flag names used in cmd/main.go
(consoleImage / --console-image) and remove any references to console-image-pf5
and console-image-4-19 so the running operator’s command-line matches the code.
- Around line 301-305: cmd/main.go computes OpenShift major/minor but never
wires it into the console Pod env; update the controller wiring so the computed
ocpVersion (fmt.Sprintf("%d.%d", major, minor)) is passed into the console
controller initialization and used when building the container Env in
internal/controller/console/deployment.go (append an EnvVar{Name:"OCP_VERSION",
Value: ocpVersion} to the slice returned by utils.GetProxyEnvVars()); keep
utils.GetProxyEnvVars() as-is and ensure the controller constructor (the
function you call from cmd/main.go to create/register the console reconciler)
accepts the ocpVersion string and forwards it to the deployment builder.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: cd2558dd-6325-4b8f-ba0f-713802c0293c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8eeee23 and c5a7b2a.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .ai/spec/what/console-ui.md
  • .ai/spec/what/system-overview.md
  • cmd/main.go
  • config/default/deployment-patch.yaml
  • hack/image_placeholders.json
  • internal/controller/utils/constants.go
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • internal/controller/utils/constants.go
  • hack/image_placeholders.json
  • config/default/deployment-patch.yaml

@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override "ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21"

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: Overrode contexts on behalf of blublinsky: ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21

Details

In response to this:

/override "ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@xrajesh

xrajesh commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xrajesh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 17, 2026
@xrajesh

xrajesh commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 17, 2026
@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override "Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator / lightspeed-operator"(https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-operator/pull/1705/checks?check_run_id=81005473880)

@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override "Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator / lightspeed-operator"

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator / lightspeed-operator"(https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-operator/pull/1705/checks?check_run_id=81005473880)

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • CodeRabbit
  • ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21
  • ci/prow/ci-index-lightspeed-bundle-test
  • ci/prow/fips-image-scan-operator
  • ci/prow/generate
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/security
  • ci/prow/unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-bundle-e2e-4-21
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-ci-index-lightspeed-bundle-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-fips-image-scan-operator
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-generate
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-security
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-unit
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override "Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator / lightspeed-operator"(https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-operator/pull/1705/checks?check_run_id=81005473880)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator / lightspeed-operator

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • CodeRabbit
  • ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21
  • ci/prow/ci-index-lightspeed-bundle-test
  • ci/prow/fips-image-scan-operator
  • ci/prow/generate
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/security
  • ci/prow/unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-bundle-e2e-4-21
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-ci-index-lightspeed-bundle-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-fips-image-scan-operator
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-generate
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-security
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-unit
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override "Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator / lightspeed-operator"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override "Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator / lightspeed-operator"

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator / lightspeed-operator

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • CodeRabbit
  • ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21
  • ci/prow/ci-index-lightspeed-bundle-test
  • ci/prow/fips-image-scan-operator
  • ci/prow/generate
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/security
  • ci/prow/unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-bundle-e2e-4-21
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-ci-index-lightspeed-bundle-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-fips-image-scan-operator
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-generate
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-security
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-unit
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override "Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator / lightspeed-operator"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override "Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator-e2e-tests / lightspeed-operator"

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator-e2e-tests / lightspeed-operator

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • CodeRabbit
  • ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21
  • ci/prow/ci-index-lightspeed-bundle-test
  • ci/prow/fips-image-scan-operator
  • ci/prow/generate
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/security
  • ci/prow/unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-bundle-e2e-4-21
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-ci-index-lightspeed-bundle-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-fips-image-scan-operator
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-generate
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-security
  • pull-ci-openshift-lightspeed-operator-main-unit
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override "Red Hat Konflux / lightspeed-agentic-operator-e2e-tests / lightspeed-operator"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@blublinsky blublinsky force-pushed the operator-console-multi-image branch from c5a7b2a to fac0a75 Compare June 17, 2026 18:10
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 17, 2026
@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: Overrode contexts on behalf of blublinsky: ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@vimalk78

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 18, 2026
@blublinsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: Overrode contexts on behalf of blublinsky: ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blublinsky: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 1a85789 into openshift:main Jun 18, 2026
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants