Skip to content

fix: read full packs from cold backend in hot/cold case - #542

Merged
aawsome merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-hotcold-full
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

fix: read full packs from cold backend in hot/cold case#542
aawsome merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-hotcold-full

Conversation

@aawsome

@aawsome aawsome commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

closes rustic-rs/rustic#1811

As a side effect, checking packs data now reads the blobs in chunks leading to less memory usage.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.91304% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 53.1%. Comparing base (304bb86) to head (66adec7).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
crates/core/src/commands/check.rs 71.4% 12 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
crates/core/src/crypto/hasher.rs 73.3% <100.0%> (+23.3%) ⬆️
crates/core/src/commands/check.rs 71.9% <71.4%> (-0.9%) ⬇️

... and 21 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@aawsome
aawsome merged commit d593325 into main Aug 12, 2026
25 checks passed
@aawsome
aawsome deleted the fix-hotcold-full branch August 12, 2026 09:15
@rustic-release-plz rustic-release-plz Bot mentioned this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustic check --read-data doesn't work on hot+cold repos

1 participant