test: cover hot/cold check --read-data routing - #1868
Draft
magrathean-uk wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Member
|
Actually #1811 is a bug in rustic_core and should be fixed there. |
Member
|
I think it might be good to have the unit test here, after rustic-rs/rustic_core#542 is used. @magrathean-uk Can you extract this so we only add the unit test with this PR? |
magrathean-uk
force-pushed
the
split/issue-1811-hot-cold-read-data
branch
from
August 10, 2026 15:27
2c3eb11 to
2e268ad
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Makes sense! I've updated the PR to remove the workaround in |
magrathean-uk
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds an integration regression test for
check --read-datawith hot/cold repositories.Status
Test-only draft. The test currently fails against the locked
rustic_core, proving the bug remains there. It is blocked on rustic-rs/rustic_core#542, which is still open. This PR does not claim to fix runtime behavior.Related to #1811.