Skip to content

fix: run CodeBoarding reviews without a synced baseline - #4

Merged
ivanmilevtues merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/review-only-no-baseline
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

fix: run CodeBoarding reviews without a synced baseline#4
ivanmilevtues merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/review-only-no-baseline

Conversation

@ivanmilevtues

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Configure CodeBoarding in review mode only, using the current v1 explicit OpenRouter inputs. Remove the sync workflow and generated committed baseline so a subsequent application PR can exercise review without a prepared base. Existing historical artifacts are left untouched. Validation: parsed the workflow YAML and checked the diff.

@ivanmilevtues
ivanmilevtues merged commit 1aadfa0 into main Sep 8, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-08T17:20:45.880463Z e27a7ab PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CodeBoarding review - not configured

llm: openrouter needs openrouter_api_key, and none is set.

1. Add a repository secret named OPENROUTER_API_KEY, with your OpenRouter API key as the value.

2. In .github/workflows/codeboarding.yml, the CodeBoarding step's with: block needs to read:

        with:
          llm: openrouter
          openrouter_api_key: ${{ secrets.OPENROUTER_API_KEY }}

No analysis ran, and no CodeBoarding hosted usage was consumed.

run 34256096110 - attempt 1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants