Add plan parent-reduction rule API - #9196
Performance Regression: -0.46%
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1927 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 51 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | decode_varbin[(1000, 2)] |
61.5 µs | 78.4 µs | -21.51% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)] |
1 ms | 1.2 ms | -11.67% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(10000, 64, 4)] |
8.6 ms | 9.7 ms | -10.57% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=16384/indices=16] |
1.3 ms | 1.2 ms | +12.41% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (1000, 16)] |
72.3 µs | 64.4 µs | +12.2% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compact_sliced[(4096, 90)] |
1.9 µs | 1.7 µs | +11.69% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compact_sliced[(16384, 90)] |
2 µs | 1.8 µs | +10.81% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing vortex-plan-rules (825351d) with vortex-plan (c351747)2
Footnotes
-
51 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
vortex-plan(55e7a8c) during the generation of this report, so 31bd037 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩