[sylvestre]

No description provided.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds a dedicated GitHub Actions workflow to ensure GitHub Copilot code review has an assigned runner/environment in this repository.

Changes:

• Introduces .github/workflows/copilot-code-review.yml with a Ubuntu runner job intended for Copilot code review startup.
• Adds basic Rust setup steps (checkout, toolchain, cache) within that job.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/symlink (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/retry (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/env/env-signal-handler was skipped on 'main' but is now failing.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will regress 1 benchmark

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 351 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 50 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	complex_relative_date	318.3 µs	330.1 µs	-3.59%
⚡	Simulation	numfmt_large_numbers_si[10000]	98.1 ms	93.6 ms	+4.8%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing sylvestre:copilot-code-review-runner (3b36bf0) with main (8dc724d)²}

Footnotes

1. 50 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (cc5e3d7) during the generation of this report, so 8dc724d was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.