ci: declare contents:read on CI workflow#2437
Open
arpitjain099 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
CI runs three notebook-only jobs (nbfmt, nblint, outputs-removed) against the diff. None touch the GitHub API beyond actions/checkout. contents:read is the minimum. Matches the per-job permissions blocks already used in notebook-pr-bot.yml and the workflow-level scopes documented in build-and-deploy.yml. Signed-off-by: Arpit Jain <arpitjain099@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
CIworkflow runs three notebook-validation jobs (nbfmt,nblint,outputs-removed) against the PR diff. None of them write to the repo or comment on the PR; they only invokeactions/setup-python,actions/checkout, and Python tools fromtensorflow-docs.This patch pins the workflow to
permissions: contents: read. With it set:Token-Permissionscheck goes green for this fileStyle matches the other workflows in this repo that already declare permissions.
No behavioural change to the three jobs.