[7ttp]

TL;DR

folds the effect lint into pnpm lint:check, so one .oxlintrc.json drives editors, agents and CI

whats introduced?

• .oxlintrc.json extends the @effect/tsgo recommended preset, and .oxlintrc.effect.json and the lint:effect:* scripts go away
• .github/scripts, the npm launcher shim, compute stack templates and the generated API contracts move to ignorePatterns, so they leave the repo lint entirely
• lint:fix applies suggestions, and fix:all runs knip, lint and format in order so fixes never race

ref

• closes: CLI-2899 & CLI-2407

[github-actions]

Superseded by a newer AI review

🤖 AI Review

Both independent reviews completed. Confirmed Claude's maintenance nit: Effect exclusions depend on a manually synchronized rule list. No additional issues found. Lint execution was unavailable because dependencies are not installed.

Findings

Severity	Location	Category	Sources	Claim
⚪ NIT	.oxlintrc.json:585	maintainability	claude	The Effect exclusions disable rules individually, so future preset additions can apply to previously excluded files unless this list is updated. Resulting diagnostics can fail CI.

Stats

Claude findings: 1 · Codex findings: 0 · Confirmed: 1 · Refuted: 0 · Uncertain: 0

---

Models: claude-opus-5-5 + gpt-6.1-sol · Trigger: auto · Workflow run

This review runs once per PR. A maintainer can request another with a /ai-review comment.

[github-actions]

CLI benchmark: no changes found

Commit a94226a against develop at e713e69 · 10 runs each · report only, never blocks merging

Command	Before	After	Change
supabase --version	183 ms	187 ms	no real change
supabase --help	195 ms	185 ms	no real change (-5%, within normal variation)
supabase init	176 ms	178 ms	no real change
supabase migration new bench	180 ms	179 ms	no real change
supabase gen types --lang typescript --project-id replayfixtureprojref	215 ms	208 ms	no real change
supabase projects list	182 ms	175 ms	no real change
supabase functions list --project-ref replayfixtureprojref	208 ms	223 ms	no real change (+7%, within normal variation)

API calls: unchanged for all 7 commands.

Binary size: 134.0 MB, unchanged.

Details: timing ranges, API calls per command, slowest phases

Timing ranges

Command	Before range	After range	Change	Verdict
supabase --version	174-238 ms	171-248 ms	+4 ms (+2%)	within noise
supabase --help	168-215 ms	172-207 ms	-10 ms (-5%)	within noise
supabase init	163-197 ms	157-199 ms	+1 ms (+1%)	within noise
supabase migration new bench	157-245 ms	156-228 ms	0 ms (0%)	within noise
supabase gen types --lang typescript --project-id replayfixtureprojref	189-262 ms	195-229 ms	-7 ms (-3%)	within noise
supabase projects list	170-206 ms	168-240 ms	-7 ms (-4%)	within noise
supabase functions list --project-ref replayfixtureprojref	187-276 ms	173-304 ms	+15 ms (+7%)	within noise

API calls per command

Command	Before	After	Endpoint changes
supabase --version	0	0
supabase --help	0	0
supabase init	0	0
supabase migration new bench	0	0
supabase gen types --lang typescript --project-id replayfixtureprojref	2	2
supabase projects list	1	1
supabase functions list --project-ref replayfixtureprojref	2	2

Slowest phases

No command moved beyond noise, so there are no phase deltas.

Comment /bench to run it again on the latest commit.

Workflow run

[7ttp]

/ai-review

[github-actions]

🤖 AI Review

Both independent reviews completed. Confirmed Claude’s minor lint-coverage finding: the consolidated configuration excludes CI scripts from all oxlint checks. Codex reported no findings. Verification was static because node_modules is absent.

Findings

Severity	Location	Category	Sources	Claim
🟡 MINOR	.oxlintrc.json:17	lint-coverage	claude	Adding .github/scripts to the global ignorePatterns removes all oxlint coverage for CI automation, rather than excluding only Effect-specific rules.

Stats

Claude findings: 1 · Codex findings: 0 · Confirmed: 1 · Refuted: 0 · Uncertain: 0

---

Models: claude-opus-5-5 + gpt-6.1-sol · Trigger: manual · Workflow run

This review runs once per PR. A maintainer can request another with a /ai-review comment.

[kanadgupta]

mind adding comments for all the ignores/exclusions?

[kanadgupta]

one more piece of feedback, apologies

[kanadgupta]

what's the context on this change (i.e., making it so pnpm fix:all only lists fmt:fix as its sole task and we use the dependsOn tree in turbo.json)?

i think the previous approach (where the tasks were listed out in this turbo run command) makes more sense to me, for a few reasons:

• these tasks not actually dependent on one another (but correct me if i'm wrong here)
• if i as a user wanted to fix oxfmt issues, i'd expect that running pnpm exec turbo run fmt:fix would only run oxfmt and not the other fixing commands
• it's antipattern compared to check:all

if the reasoning for this change is that we can't run these three commands in parallel, we should use --concurrency 1 instead

suggestion if these can run in parallel:

Suggested change

	"fix:all": "pnpm exec turbo run fmt:fix --continue=always",
	"fix:all": "pnpm exec turbo run lint:fix fmt:fix knip:fix",

suggestion if these cannot run in parallel:

Suggested change

	"fix:all": "pnpm exec turbo run fmt:fix --continue=always",
	"fix:all": "pnpm exec turbo run lint:fix fmt:fix knip:fix --concurrency 1 --continue=always",

[kanadgupta]

per my feedback above

Suggested change

	"cache": false,
	"dependsOn": ["knip:fix"]
	"cache": false

[kanadgupta]

per my feedback above

Suggested change

	"cache": false,
	"dependsOn": ["lint:fix"]
	"cache": false