Skip to content

add OCP4_MIGRATION_PLAN - #1892

Draft
tommartensen wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
tm/plan-ocp-4-migration
Draft

add OCP4_MIGRATION_PLAN#1892
tommartensen wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
tm/plan-ocp-4-migration

Conversation

@tommartensen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@tommartensen, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 59 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Central YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: db62947d-582f-4f35-8993-e30475fd84f8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3d91a7 and 7fa9219.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OCP4_MIGRATION_PLAN.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch tm/plan-ocp-4-migration

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@rhacs-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A single node development cluster (infra-pr-1892) was allocated in production infra for this PR.

CI will attempt to deploy quay.io/rhacs-eng/infra-server: to it.

🔌 You can connect to this cluster with:

gcloud container clusters get-credentials infra-pr-1892 --zone us-central1-a --project acs-team-temp-dev

🛠️ And pull infractl from the deployed dev infra-server with:

nohup kubectl -n infra port-forward svc/infra-server-service 8443:8443 &
make pull-infractl-from-dev-server

🔓 You must go to to export an . Your token from the prod infra instance will not work with dev environments.

🚲 You can then use the dev infra instance e.g.:

bin/infractl -k -e localhost:8443 whoami

⚠️ Any clusters that you start using your dev infra instance should have a lifespan shorter then the development cluster instance. Otherwise they will not be destroyed when the dev infra instance ceases to exist when the development cluster is deleted. ⚠️

Further Development

☕ If you make changes, you can commit and push and CI will take care of updating the development cluster.

🚀 If you only modify configuration (chart/infra-server/configuration) or templates (chart/infra-server/{static,templates}), you can get a faster update with:

make helm-deploy

Logs

Logs for the development infra depending on your @redhat.com authuser:

Or:

kubectl -n infra logs -l app=infra-server --tail=1 -f

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants