Lint ignored #[inline] on function prototypes - #65294
Conversation
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
cc @rust-lang/lang This seems like a reasonable extension of the |
|
We should do a crater run of this once it builds, because it's possible (as seen in bitflags) that there are accidental |
This is just a lint, right? I don't think we need a crater run to ward off ecosystem breakage for new lints, especially on one that's so niche. |
|
If you look at the diff it introduces both warnings and errors in different places. |
|
Based on my skimming of the tests, is it correct that the errors arise when |
|
Errors were previously emitted on So this adds both a lint, but also errors that had previously accidentally been left out. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
8efdaee to
15c5973
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@bors try |
|
⌛ Trying commit 185b013a9f9d1286e7ae78ff1593d10dcca8b2f8 with merge 38f08371587f97c145dedb2c055ac7b01bf1e788... |
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-azure |
|
@craterbot check |
|
👌 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
|
🚧 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
|
🎉 Experiment
|
|
⌛ Testing commit f47f530 with merge a77114b5f48a74317d731c20883212038125667b... |
|
@bors retry |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #65919) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Fixes #51280.
unused_attributelint for#[inline]on function prototypes.