Add more example target_arch values#2279
Open
patchunwrap wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
These have been collected from https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/arch/index.html Since mips was already on the list all target arch options have been added (even ones not available on stable Rust). A note has been added to inform the reader about target_arch availability.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These have been collected from
https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/arch/index.html
Since mips was already on the list I figured I would add all target arch options have been added (even ones not available on stable Rust) and add a note to help the reader have the right expectations.
I found this when trying to figure out what the target_arch for riscv would be. I guess I kinda assumed it would be
riscv64gc. If there is a different authoritative document somewhere, maybe this should link to that instead. But I figured the reference was that authoritative document.