Unchanged coverage treated as a Coverage evolution decrease

[jgravois]

greetings and thank you for maintaining this awesome github action! 👋

i've noticed some counter-intuitive behavior in my own project. is it by design that only an increase in coverage results in a green 'Coverage evolution' badge?

live example: cal-itp/benefits#4103 (comment)

perhaps its just a quirk/misconfiguration on my end? I would expect to see: 🟢 Coverage evolution: 94% = 94% 🟢

[ewjoachim]

https://github.com/py-cov-action/python-coverage-comment-action/releases/tag/v4.4

[ewjoachim]

I would expect to see: 🟢 Coverage evolution: 94% = 94% 🟢

the > doesn't stand for greater but for went from x to y. I've replaced it with an arrow (in addition to solving the floating point bug)(... I think :D)

[jgravois]

the > doesn't stand for greater

ah. in this case i agree that an arrow is an improvement!

(in addition to solving the floating point bug)(... I think :D)

rock n roll! 🎸 i'll update and let you know if i see anything unexpected.

thanks for engaging!

edit: looks great to me! cal-itp/benefits#4113

[thekaveman]

@ewjoachim thank you so much for the quick fix here!

[ewjoachim]

You're welcome. Thanks for raising this.