You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
GSoC feedback on the pvlib contribution process #2078
I think I am missing some documentation guidelines. E.g., when a parameter in a function is unitless, how to you denote that? Right now, I found three different ways: [-], [unitless], or nothing.
[Adam] - we should make a template function that showcases our preferences in how to write a function, e.g., function name, units, etc.
Activity
IoannisSifnaios commentedon Jun 6, 2024
I think I am missing some documentation guidelines. E.g., when a parameter in a function is unitless, how to you denote that? Right now, I found three different ways: [-], [unitless], or nothing.
[Adam] - we should make a template function that showcases our preferences in how to write a function, e.g., function name, units, etc.
cwhanse commentedon Jun 6, 2024
I prefer
[unitless]but I don't think we've made a consensus choice.@pvlib/pvlib-core your vote?
[unitless],[-]or nothing?