Repository navigation
v0.9.5 release planning #1681
Description
Keeping to the quarterly release schedule means releasing 0.9.5 sometime in mid March. I arbitrarily suggest March 15 for the target release date.
Looking through the v0.9.5 milestone, these PRs seem like they are close to being ready to merge and are thus candidates for inclusion:
- add Boland DF estimation #1179
- use horner's method in disc #1183
- Test pvsystem.singlediode against precisely generated IV curves #1573
- Add
model='gueymard2003'toget_relative_airmass#1655 - Vectorize
pvlib.bifacial.utils._vf_ground_sky_2dacrosssurface_tilt#1682 - update copyright #1692
- Update adrinverter parameter database #1695
Kicking down the road:
- Add map_variables parameter to read_tmy3 function #1623
- Migrate spectral modifier functions to pvlib.spectrum #1628
- Add N. Martin & J. M. Ruiz spectral response mismatch modifiers model #1658
- Correct infinite_sheds view factor from row to sky and ground; expose vf functions in bifacial.utils #1666
- Compatibility with pandas 2.0.0 #1672
@pvlib/pvlib-core please review any PRs that interest you. I volunteer to solicit reviewers for PRs that don't attract attention on their own over the next couple weeks.
Activity
cwhanse commentedon Mar 2, 2023
I will submit to close #1586
adriesse commentedon Mar 2, 2023
Based on the latest comments, I would not wait for #1658.
kandersolar commentedon Mar 16, 2023
Assuming nobody objects, I'll plan to merge #1183 and #1682 tomorrow (March 17) and proceed with making the release. The other PRs in the list above are not ready yet, I think.
cwhanse commentedon Mar 16, 2023
I'm working on #1666 but computing the known solution for the test case is tedious. I wouldn't wait.
adriesse commentedon Mar 16, 2023
I'd like to have #1695 included, it there are no objections.
mikofski commentedon Mar 16, 2023
If we wait on #1666, then I'd like to push another release as soon as possible after this one. A hot fix.
mikofski commentedon Mar 16, 2023
@kanderso-nrel oops sorry, I merged it already 🤷
wholmgren commentedon Mar 17, 2023
What about #1687 in 0.9.5? It's currently marked for 0.10, but @mikofski and the contributor are resolving merge conflicts in 0.9.5, so there's some misaligned expectations. I am -1 on 0.9.5 given the lack of consensus on if it's a good idea and, from a quick look, a need to improve consistency with pvlib style (variable names, positional vs keyword args).
cwhanse commentedon Mar 17, 2023
I marked #1687 for v0.10 because the comments indicate a lack of consensus.
mikofski commentedon Mar 17, 2023
I agree, let's push #1687 to v0.10. I'll communicate with contributor