REQ-021 is NOT satisfied by FEAT-065 alone — record why, before it looks it - #182
Merged
Conversation
…oks it
With FEAT-065 now `accepted`, REQ-021 READS satisfiable and is not. The
adjudication MACHINERY exists and is verified; the LOOP it promises cannot
converge. Nothing on the requirement said so, which is how a future sweep
promotes it.
Measured by FEAT-065's own AC13 run over scry's history (4 commit pairs,
~13,800 obligations each):
* `discharged` = 0 on every real pair
* the gate FAILS on every real pair
* ~47% `uncertain`, matching scry#123's measured 43-45% identity churn
* on a STRIPPED module `discharged` is UNREACHABLE by construction (FEAT-087:
ident_survives_own_edit false for 10,520 of 10,520), and stripping is
standard in release builds
The obstacle is PRECISION, not adjudication. A correct div-by-zero repair guards
with `br_if` on `i32.eqz`, which establishes a disequality, and an interval
cannot represent one (scry#165) -- so the fix is invisible and the agent is told
the obligation still stands. An agent gated on that re-fixes working code, which
is the failure REQ-021 exists to prevent.
FEAT-089 is the unblocker, now recorded as a typed `depends-on` rather than left
implicit in prose. What would discharge REQ-021: FEAT-089 landing, then a
re-measurement showing a genuine fix reaching `discharged` on a shape an agent
would actually write.
rivet=0 claim-check=0 drift-gate=0 fmt=0.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KkNzkNYzPh7366DkNijeNc
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Automated review for PR #182pulseengine/scry: Verdict: 💬 Comment Summary: Adds requirement documentation and records convergence limit. Findings: 0 mechanical (rivet) · 2 from local AI model. Findings (2):
Generated by a local AI model and post-validated against a strict JSON contract. Each finding includes the verbatim line being criticised — verify by reading the file at the cited location. Reviewed at |
📐 rivet artifact deltaPR: #182 Base SHA: Validationhead — `rivet validate` resultbase — `rivet validate` result (for comparison)Artifact stats
full stats — headDiff (base → head)AADL model — headPosted by the |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With FEAT-065 now
accepted, REQ-021 reads satisfiable and is not. The adjudicationmachinery exists and is verified; the loop it promises cannot converge. Nothing on
the requirement said so — which is exactly how a future sweep promotes it.
Measured, by FEAT-065's own AC13 run
Four commit pairs of scry's history, ~13,800 obligations each:
dischargeduncertaindischargedunreachable by construction — FEAT-087 measuredident_survives_own_editfalse for 10,520 of 10,520, and stripping is standard in release buildsThe obstacle is precision, not adjudication
A correct div-by-zero repair guards with
br_ifoni32.eqz, establishing adisequality — and an interval cannot represent one (#165). So the fix is invisible,
the agent is told the obligation still stands, and an agent gated on that re-fixes
working code. That is the failure REQ-021 exists to prevent, reproduced by the thing
meant to prevent it.
What changes
depends-onrather than implicit in prose — the graph sayswhat blocks what
What would discharge it: FEAT-089 landing, then a re-measurement showing a genuine
fix reaching
dischargedon a shape an agent would actually write.rivet=0 claim-check=0 drift-gate=0 fmt=0🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01KkNzkNYzPh7366DkNijeNc