Skip to content

chore: bump other codeql workflows - #947

Merged
nbbeeken merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-codeql
Oct 30, 2026
Merged

nbbeeken merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-codeql

Conversation

@nbbeeken

@nbbeeken nbbeeken commented Oct 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

My mistake, I thought dependabot knew what it was doing.

Adds a group so codeql bumps won't be separated again

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 30, 2026 19:43
@nbbeeken
nbbeeken requested review from a team as code owners October 30, 2026 19:43
@nbbeeken
nbbeeken requested a review from dudaschar October 30, 2026 19:43
@nbbeeken
nbbeeken enabled auto-merge (squash) October 30, 2026 19:44

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

No active review issues are reported for the CodeQL action pin update and Dependabot grouping change.

No open issues 🎉

What changed in this PR

Updates the CodeQL initialization action and configures Dependabot to group future CodeQL action updates together.

Changes:

  • Bumps the pinned commit for github/codeql-action/init, retaining v4.
  • Adds a Dependabot group matching github/codeql-action/*.
File Description
.github/​workflows/​codeql.yml Updates the CodeQL initialization action’s pinned commit.
.github/​dependabot.yml Groups CodeQL action updates into a single Dependabot pull request.

Review effort: Balanced

@nbbeeken
nbbeeken merged commit 5ea6761 into main Oct 30, 2026
28 of 34 checks passed
@nbbeeken
nbbeeken deleted the fix-codeql branch October 30, 2026 20:33
submodules: recursive

- name: Initialize CodeQL
uses: github/codeql-action/init@2892aa5e19bbd11bc0cff5427e3b750a04d9e3c2 # v4

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it still v4 if we changed the hash?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants