board_spec: complete storage metadata and validate PSRAM capabilities - #328
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Record absent PSRAM for Station, DinMeter, AirQ, StickC and CoreInk, including the documented flash capacities for Station and the ESP32-S3FN8 boards. Validate storage claims against chip capabilities even when a PSRAM device declaration is missing. Cover every resolved variant and reject positive capacity on chips without PSRAM support. Regenerate resolved snapshots and the standalone editor.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
storage.psram_mb/psram_modeagainst the chip's PSRAM capabilities even when the board has no PSRAM device declaration (newE_PSRAM_UNSUPPORTED;E_PSRAM_MODEnow also applies without a device).