Repository navigation
fix(licence): declare MPL-2.0 for code and CC-BY-SA-4.0 for prose - #110
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner ruling on #109: sanctify-php is MPL-2.0 for code and CC-BY-SA-4.0 for prose. LICENSE and every source SPDX header already said MPL-2.0; this brings the declarations that disagreed into line: - sanctify-php.cabal `license:` LicenseRef-PMPL-1.0-or-later -> MPL-2.0 (the field the Licence consistency gate compares with LICENSE) - CITATION.cff, stapeln.toml, the k9 project-metadata example - DUBLINCORE.rdf and void.ttl, which pointed dcterms:license at AGPL-3.0 - README licence section and badge, QUICKSTART*, docs/README, llm-warmup-*, www/.well-known/{humans,ai}.txt - docs/accessibility/README is prose, so it now says CC-BY-SA-4.0 - NOTICE rewritten: it cited LICENSES/PMPL-1.0-or-later.txt, which does not exist - PALIMPSEST.adoc and the unused LICENSES/AGPL-3.0-or-later.txt removed - the ROADMAP Guix sketch now says license:mpl2.0 CHANGELOG history and the .a2ml files are left as they are. Closes #109 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012kgrMQRhSmZMBbF9Ui1zBw
Contributor
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... ⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Applies the owner's ruling on #109: sanctify-php is MPL-2.0 for code and CC-BY-SA-4.0 for prose. That matches the estate licence policy (standards
3-practice/LICENCE-POLICY.adocRule 1). sanctify-php is not on the Rule 2 PMPL register.LICENSE(verbatim MPL-2.0) and every source file's SPDX header already said MPL-2.0. This PR fixes the declarations that disagreed with them:sanctify-php.caballicense::LicenseRef-PMPL-1.0-or-later→MPL-2.0. This is the field thegovernance / Licence consistencygate compares withLICENSE.CITATION.cff,stapeln.tomland the k9project-metadataexample: →MPL-2.0.DUBLINCORE.rdfandvoid.ttllinkeddcterms:licenseto AGPL-3.0. Both now link to MPL-2.0.QUICKSTART*.adoc,docs/README.adoc,llm-warmup-*.adoc,www/.well-known/{humans,ai}.txt: → MPL-2.0 for code, CC-BY-SA-4.0 for docs.docs/accessibility/README.adocis prose, so it now declares CC-BY-SA-4.0.NOTICErewritten. It citedLICENSES/PMPL-1.0-or-later.txt, which does not exist.PALIMPSEST.adocand the unusedLICENSES/AGPL-3.0-or-later.txt: no file in the tree is AGPL-licensed.docs/ROADMAP.adocnow sayslicense:mpl2.0.Left as they are: CHANGELOG history, the
.a2mlfiles, and thesetup-repo.k9.nclrecipe example.Closes #109
Type of change
LICENSE.LICENSEand the SPDX headers) is unchanged; only contradicting metadata moves to match it..cabalchange is metadata only.📌 New pins
Head SHA:
9d6a8a935b0f6d20bab6b6e62bbebc0cad2d9a03. No pins are added or changed.How has this been verified?
scripts/check-licence-consistency.sh, taken fromstandardsorigin/main:[OK] Licence identity matches manifest declaration.,[OK] Licence consistency check passed., rc 0.mainb0eba0f: rc 1 (Licence-vs-manifest mismatch: licence='MPL-2.0' manifest='LicenseRef-PMPL-1.0-or-later'). This matches CI's failure on main.grep -rni 'PMPL\|palimpsest\|agpl'outside CHANGELOG,.a2mlfiles andsetup-repo.k9.ncl→ onlycontractile.just(a grep that accepts either licence) and a keyword in.github/label-classifier.json.Horizon of this check: it covers the licence gate and the text of every declaration listed above. No cabal build ran.
cabal checkwould confirm thatMPL-2.0is accepted, but cabal is not installed locally.MPL-2.0is a standard SPDX identifier, andcabal-version: 3.0accepts SPDX expressions.Checklist
git commit -S).git log --format=%G?→G.SPDX-License-Identifier: no new files.Deferred red checks
governance / Actions lockfile verify: already red onmain, deferred to Actions lockfile verify red on main: 3 stale actions.lock entries #108 (staleactions.lockentries).Haskell CI(build) dies atstartup_failureon every run since 2026-10-03, onmaintoo. This is probably the same lock drift: tracked in Actions lockfile verify red on main: 3 stale actions.lock entries #108.Notes for reviewers
The owner's ruling was given in a Claude Code session on 2026-10-07: "mpl-2.0 for code, cc-by-sa-4.0 for prose".
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_012kgrMQRhSmZMBbF9Ui1zBw