Skip to content

Next affirmation: cite the deed/A2ML rulings and drop the <standards> placeholder (review of #217) #218

Description

@hyperpolymath

CodeRabbit's review of #217 found two faults in AFFIRMATION.adoc as signed at anchor 008665f8. The file is the owner's signed commit, so it cannot change in place. Both fixes belong in the next re-anchored affirmation.

  1. Lines 158–161 say there is no bofig_chora.deed, that the descriptive metadata is still A2ML, and that A2ML is retired. Both facts hold at 008665f8: the tree has no *chora.deed, and .machine_readable/6a2/ holds six .a2ml files. The text does not cite the rulings, though. They are D99/D269c (A2ML retired) and D312 (deed), recorded on Owner decision sheet D1–D293: one answerable place for #637 + #715 + #709 + #658 (superseded by successor — see latest comment) standards#787. (thread)
  2. Lines 517 and 522 use a literal <standards> placeholder in the reproduction block: the cp of the estate gitleaks baseline, and the k9-validate.sh call. Bash reads <standards> as a redirect, so neither line runs as written. (thread)

Acceptance criteria

Deferral record for #217 under the estate's PR-done rule: review output that cannot be acted on in this PR is tracked here.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Activity

  1. added
    decisionA ruling is required before work can proceed
    scaffoldingRSR templates, repo init, instantiation, project skeletons
    on Oct 9, 2026
  2. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    decisionA ruling is required before work can proceedscaffoldingRSR templates, repo init, instantiation, project skeletons

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions