ci: contain gfql-only test fanout#1699
Merged
Merged
Conversation
1a63775 to
5e1e73c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Safety checks
Historical target
Latest-30 merged PR sampling after #1690/#1691/#1692/#1694 showed GFQL/cypher as the largest remaining safe opportunity: 11 of 30 sampled non-CI-stack merged PRs were GFQL/cypher-shaped.
Coverage notes
GFQL-only still runs changed-line-coverage and test-core-python to preserve the core coverage artifact. NetworkX policy still runs for GFQL/cypher lowering/procedure paths and GFQL procedure-call planning files that can affect NetworkX behavior.