Skip to content

docs: publish round 2 of the agent test, decision rule failed (#78) - #87

Closed
thegdsks wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
bench/round2-results
Closed

thegdsks wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
bench/round2-results

Conversation

@thegdsks

@thegdsks thegdsks commented Nov 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Publishes round 2 of the pre-registered agent test, with the decision rule applied as written. Refs #78.

Result

The rule fails. Steering e does not become the default.

  • 650 main sessions on four repos (control, a, e, and e with small repo mode on the smallest). Notional spend 15.77 USD, no errors, no session over its cap.
  • Cost against control, pooled over all four repos: a 1.17 [1.11, 1.24], e 1.09 [1.04, 1.14]. Without the contaminated featuredrop repo, e is 1.05 [1.00, 1.11].
  • Per repo (e): levelrail 0.87 [0.81, 0.93], theauth-go 1.05 [0.95, 1.16], featuredrop 1.21 [1.14, 1.29], theauth 1.42 [1.36, 1.48].
  • e costs less than a on cost at equal correctness (0.93 [0.90, 0.95]).
  • Correctness is level: 97.5% control, 97.0% a, 97.5% e.
  • Tool calls 0.76 and turns 0.83 of control. Grep and glob calls 0.53 with e, 0.22 with a.
  • Rule outcomes: P1 fail, G2 fail, S1 fail by 0.01 on the cost bound; P2, P3, P4 pass; G1 passes but says nothing (control was already 100% on trace).

What this means

Stacklit lowers cost on the large repo in both rounds (round 1: 0.78 [0.70, 0.86]; round 2: 0.87 to 0.89). On the smaller repos tested it costs more. No general cost saving is claimed.

Notes

  • Memorisation check: featuredrop was contaminated (3 of 6 answered with no tools); results are shown with and without it.
  • Grading defects are listed and reported as a separate adjusted column, not used by the rule.
  • Round 1 files are unchanged. Round 2 outputs live in bench/agent-ab/round2/ and results-round2/.
  • Raw records were scanned for local paths and secrets.

@thegdsks

thegdsks commented Nov 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Superseded by the combined PR that also corrects the site claims.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant