fix: record methods with @Labels even if they look trivial#327
Draft
fix: record methods with @Labels even if they look trivial#327
Conversation
Methods annotated with @Labels (or named explicitly under `methods:` in appmap.yml, or labeled there) were being dropped by the getter/setter trivial-method filter before the agent ever consulted the opt-in. They now bypass that filter so explicit user intent always wins. Extract the @Labels-by-name reading from CodeObject into a shared LabelUtil so ConfigCondition can ask the same question during match. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Methods annotated with @Labels (or named explicitly under
methods:in appmap.yml, or labeled there) were being dropped by the getter/setter trivial-method filter before the agent ever consulted the opt-in. They now bypass that filter so explicit user intent always wins.Extract the @Labels-by-name reading from CodeObject into a shared LabelUtil so ConfigCondition can ask the same question during match.