-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
[material_ui] Fixes SearchAnchor and SearchBar semantics #12680
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
chunhtai
wants to merge
3
commits into
flutter:main
Choose a base branch
from
chunhtai:issues/190884
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+56
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions
3
packages/material_ui/pending_changelogs/change_2026_08_27_search_bar_semantics.yaml
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
| changelog: | | ||
| - Fixes unlabeled tap target semantics in `SearchBar`. | ||
| version: patch |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hardcoding
excludeFromSemantics: trueon theSearchAnchor'sGestureDetectorwill cause an accessibility regression for custom builders. If a developer provides a custom non-tappable widget (like a simpleTextorIcon) inwidget.builder, it relies on thisGestureDetectorto provide the semantic tap action. WithexcludeFromSemantics: true, the widget will become completely non-interactive for screen readers.To fix this while still resolving the duplicate semantics issue for
SearchBar, we should introduce anexcludeFromSemanticsproperty toSearchAnchor(defaulting tofalse). Then, we can set it totruein theSearchAnchor.barfactory constructor.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
right, this is something I worry, but is this a common case? @QuncCccccc , if people indeed tend to provide passive component in the builder, we will have turn this into a widget parameter that something like SearchAnchor(automaticallyTapHandler:)
which will base on this parameter to build or not build a gesture recognizer. and user will need to be smart about when to set it to true or false