Add scenario access list support#581
Open
karlfloersch wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
zeroXbrock
requested changes
May 12, 2026
Member
zeroXbrock
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR @karlfloersch!
Author
|
Thank you! |
Author
|
I should have mentioned this earlier: THIS CODE WAS AI GENERATED (5.5 high fwiw) |
Member
😂 no problem, all code is welcome here. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds first-class EIP-2930 access-list entries to scenario-generated transaction requests. Scenario authors can now specify
[[spam.tx.access_list]]entries with an address and storage keys, and Contender threads those entries into AlloyTransactionRequest.access_list.The implementation keeps access lists generic and compatible with EIP-1559 transaction completion.
Validation
cargo +1.94.0 fmt --checkcargo +1.94.0 test -p contender_core access_list --libcargo +1.94.0 test -p contender_testfile access_list --libcargo +1.94.0 test -p contender_testfile --libNote:
cargo +1.94.0 test -p contender_core --libwas also run and had 36 passing tests with 4 existing Anvil/provider-style failures unrelated to this change.