Skip to content

Process v2.0.0#627

Open
a-zw wants to merge 2 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:process-v2
Open

Process v2.0.0#627
a-zw wants to merge 2 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:process-v2

Conversation

@a-zw

@a-zw a-zw commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //src:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.6.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: dfdff570-0276-4b7d-8c4e-50e867740e42
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
WARNING: Target pattern parsing failed.
ERROR: Skipping '//src:license-check': no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
ERROR: no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
INFO: Elapsed time: 5.964s
INFO: 0 processes.
ERROR: Build did NOT complete successfully
ERROR: Build failed. Not running target

@a-zw

a-zw commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author
WARNING: src/extensions/score_metamodel/metamodel.yaml:440: Could not find tool_req__docs_arch_links in documentation [CODE LINK] [score_source_code_linker]
WARNING: src/extensions/score_metamodel/metamodel.yaml:444: Could not find tool_req__docs_arch_links in documentation [CODE LINK] [score_source_code_linker]
WARNING: src/extensions/score_metamodel/metamodel.yaml:466: Could not find tool_req__docs_arch_links in documentation [CODE LINK] [score_source_code_linker]
WARNING: src/extensions/score_metamodel/metamodel.yaml:541: Could not find tool_req__docs_arch_links in documentation [CODE LINK] [score_source_code_linker]
WARNING: src/extensions/score_metamodel/metamodel.yaml:556: Could not find tool_req__docs_arch_links in documentation [CODE LINK] [score_source_code_linker]
WARNING: src/extensions/score_metamodel/metamodel.yaml:596: Could not find tool_req__docs_arch_links in documentation [CODE LINK] [score_source_code_linker]
WARNING: src/extensions/score_metamodel/metamodel.yaml:620: Could not find tool_req__docs_arch_links in documentation [CODE LINK] [score_source_code_linker]

Removed:
gd_req__impl_diagram_safety
gd_req__impl_diagram_status
gd_req__impl_diagram_check_id
gd_req__impl_diagram_linkage_id
gd_req__impl_diagram_check_includes
gd_req__impl_diagram_linkage_includes

This implies tool_req__docs_arch_links is obsolete
and we can remove these parts from the metamodel.
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

Comment thread src/extensions/score_metamodel/metamodel.yaml
Comment on lines -775 to -778
gd_req__impl_diagram_check_id,
gd_req__impl_diagram_linkage_id,
gd_req__impl_diagram_check_includes,
gd_req__impl_diagram_linkage_includes,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of these four requirements were removed in process v2.0.0 and there is no replacement afaik.

Thus, I removed tool_req__docs_arch_links and also removed the corresponding implementation in metamodel.yaml.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Turns out the removal was an accident.

So we must not remove this here and instead fix the process.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants