-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
Pass TPA through host-runtime contract instead of property string #132861
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
elinor-fung
wants to merge
14
commits into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
elinor-fung:host-contract-tpa
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+921
−128
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ca07d53
Pass TPA assemblies through host contract
elinor-fung ed8a75c
Update TPA contract tests and tracing
elinor-fung 92bc4f3
Preserve explicit TPA host properties
elinor-fung f3f09f7
Use TPA callbacks in CoreRun
elinor-fung b7529d8
Support TPA host callbacks in Mono
elinor-fung c3ba6cb
Test TPA callback property reconstruction
elinor-fung 30dc6dc
Deduplicate TPA path directories
elinor-fung dec2d68
Use offsets into path entries when building TPA
elinor-fung 3baf094
Fix unix build
elinor-fung 7e4fb8a
Update doc
elinor-fung 5542638
Fix tests on macOS
elinor-fung 2182965
Keep only names in runtime
elinor-fung 0d05f43
Fix browser mono build
elinor-fung bce7e2b
Add ConditionalFact to test
elinor-fung File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it save even more memory allocations and copying if we stopped building the hashtable here and asked the host to resolve the assembly name to a filepath on demand every time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call. But maybe still keep the names only? The runtime does a case-insensitive hash for the names, which I don't know that we want to make any host's responsibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds reasonable