Skip to content

Update the Sequester config for reporting - #13056

Open
BillWagner wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BillWagner:sequester-reporting-labels
Open

Update the Sequester config for reporting#13056
BillWagner wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BillWagner:sequester-reporting-labels

Conversation

@BillWagner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add the new labels configured for updated reporting.

Add the new labels configured for updated reporting.
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 4, 2026 20:22
@BillWagner
BillWagner requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2026 20:22
@BillWagner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@gewarren I haven't configured the labels in this repo for the new reporting. We can edit the PR and then create the corresponding labels.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The change is a straightforward, JSON-valid configuration update that’s consistent with existing label-based automation usage in the repo.

Pull request overview

Updates the repository’s quest-config.json configuration used by the quest/sequester automation to support updated reporting by mapping additional GitHub labels to work item tags.

Changes:

  • Adds a WorkItemTags mapping list to translate specific labels into reporting tags.
  • Preserves existing trigger/import labels and makes DefaultParentNode JSON-valid by adding the trailing comma.
File summaries
File Description
quest-config.json Adds new label→tag mappings under WorkItemTags for updated reporting.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants