Skip to content

feat: add local codex cli provider#2381

Draft
luboszima wants to merge 1 commit into
docker:mainfrom
luboszima:feat/local-codex-provider
Draft

feat: add local codex cli provider#2381
luboszima wants to merge 1 commit into
docker:mainfrom
luboszima:feat/local-codex-provider

Conversation

@luboszima
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@luboszima luboszima commented Apr 11, 2026

Draft PR for: #1752

  • after original issue will be resolved please close this PR.

Description

Motivation: I tried to fix docker-agent to use codex subscription which I am using by local codex-cli.

Tests

tested locally with:

./bin/docker-agent run --exec  ./examples/basic_agent.yaml --model openai-codex/gpt-5.3-codex  "Reply with exactly: ok"

or

./bin/docker-agent run --exec  ./examples/basic_agent.yaml --model openai-codex/gpt-5.4  "Reply with exactly: ok" 

Test output:

--- Agent: root ---
ok%  
image

@luboszima luboszima requested a review from a team as a code owner April 11, 2026 12:56
@luboszima luboszima marked this pull request as draft April 11, 2026 12:56
@luboszima luboszima changed the title draft: add local codex cli provider feat: add local codex cli provider Apr 11, 2026
@aheritier aheritier added kind/feat PR adds a new feature (maps to feat: commit prefix) area/providers/openai For features/issues/fixes related to the usage of OpenAI models priority:low Nice-to-have, can be deferred indefinitely pr:needs-rebase PR has merge conflicts or is out of date with main and removed priority:low Nice-to-have, can be deferred indefinitely labels May 6, 2026
@aheritier
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

needs to be rebased (at the minimum). Moving it to draft
OpenAI / Codex looks to be (nowadays) more open than Anthropic which is making this forbidden

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/providers/openai For features/issues/fixes related to the usage of OpenAI models kind/feat PR adds a new feature (maps to feat: commit prefix) pr:needs-rebase PR has merge conflicts or is out of date with main

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants