Skip to content

docs: llms.txt point to the skills registry instead of duplicating fetch steps - #673

Open
marc0olo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
agent-skills-llms-pointer
Open

docs: llms.txt point to the skills registry instead of duplicating fetch steps#673
marc0olo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
agent-skills-llms-pointer

Conversation

@marc0olo

@marc0olo marc0olo commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

The generated docs llms.txt "Agent skills" section now points to the canonical, choice-offering entrypoint (https://skills.internetcomputer.org/llms.txt) instead of duplicating fetch-and-remember instructions, and drops the now-unused skillsBase.

  • docs-site/plugins/astro-agent-docs.mjs

Branch brought up to date with main (merge; was 13 behind), merges clean.

Validation

astro build of the docs site passes; the generated llms.txt contains the pointer and the old block is gone.

Companion PRs

…teps

Replaces the '## Agent skills' block's inline fetch-and-remember instructions
with a short pointer to https://skills.internetcomputer.org/llms.txt (the
canonical, choice-offering entry point), and drops the now-unused skillsBase.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates generated agent documentation to reference the canonical ICP skills registry instructions.

Changes:

  • Replaces duplicated skill-fetch guidance with the canonical llms.txt link.
  • Removes the unused skillsBase constant.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@marc0olo marc0olo changed the title docs llms.txt: point to the skills registry instead of duplicating fetch steps docs: llms.txt point to the skills registry instead of duplicating fetch steps Jul 24, 2026
@marc0olo
marc0olo marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2026 10:55
@marc0olo
marc0olo requested a review from a team as a code owner July 27, 2026 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants