fix(surveyor): keep issue aggregation inside jq - #228
Conversation
@coderabbitai full review |
|
✅ Action performedFull review finished. |
|
Understand this PR’s impact Explore downstream dependencies and potential security impact with Blast Radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (3)Any change to the plugin set updates both manifests in the same PR📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md) Files:
A plugin's version is its cache key — move it whenever its content changes.📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md) Files:
keep manifests/README cross-tool📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md) Files:
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.23.2)plugins/agentic-engineering/agents/portfolio-surveyor.agent.md[warning] 85-85: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines (MD031, blanks-around-fences) 🔇 Additional comments (6)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe portfolio-surveyor guidance now uses an admitted Priority: ⬇️ Low Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to No actionable merge-blocking risk remains from the reviewed change. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
@codex review for the Markdown spacing follow-up and resulting desired-state digest |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ef40ebcd52
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@codex review for the paginated completeness check and distinct missing issue-type grouping |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2f2728503b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@codex review for the external jq reducer required by gh paginate slurp, including the live-read fixture |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: eb52b3c2a3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
@codex review for the jq exit-status fixture and raw GraphQL string fields |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Readiness at |
1 participant
Why
Portfolio surveys were repeatedly losing issue evidence because they retried a summarization command that the read-only safety boundary correctly rejects.
What
Teach the Surveyor to summarize issue data inside an approved read, with a behavioral check that preserves the existing safety boundary. This ships as agentic-engineering 5.1.7.
Fixes #227