Skip to content

Release 0.8.0 - #424

Merged
currentbits merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
release/0.8.0
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

currentbits merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
release/0.8.0

Conversation

@currentbits

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Version 0.8.0: the new app layout (#420), What I noticed and drafting quiet checks (#421), and the context estimate (#422).

Checks: cargo test -p mimir-core --lib (327 passed).

After merging: tag v0.8.0, let release.yml draft the installers, notarize the Mac app locally, publish.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Willem and others added 2 commits November 11, 2026 20:08
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-11T19:10:40.288355Z 6876339 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 68763395f5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +301 to +302
.prepare("SELECT 1 FROM skills WHERE scope=?1 AND bot_id=?2 AND lower(name)=lower(?3) AND kind IN ('saved','library') AND status IN ('active','removed')")?
.exists(params![scope, k.bot_id, k.name])?;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve chosen-skill provenance across renamed merges

When a saved or library skill is merged into a skill with a different name, subsequent fixes lose the “You chose” notice. skill_merge_propose allows the merged skill to have a new name and records its source IDs in replaces, but this query only checks historical rows with the current name. For example, merging a library skill “Pay safely” into “Pay invoices”, accepting it, and then patching “Pay invoices” produces no notice even though it incorporates a skill the user explicitly chose. Follow the merge ancestry (or persist the chosen provenance) so this approval context survives accepted merges.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@currentbits
currentbits merged commit ae6f2af into master Nov 11, 2026
7 checks passed
@currentbits
currentbits deleted the release/0.8.0 branch November 11, 2026 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant