Skip to content

chores(deps): Update ubi base image digest#3258

Open
simonbaird wants to merge 1 commit intoconforma:mainfrom
simonbaird:main-ubi-bump-260420161322
Open

chores(deps): Update ubi base image digest#3258
simonbaird wants to merge 1 commit intoconforma:mainfrom
simonbaird:main-ubi-bump-260420161322

Conversation

@simonbaird
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 20, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c43d4604-2a75-408b-af19-5daf5c910b3e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64c9678 and abe70f1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Dockerfile
  • Dockerfile.dist

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two Dockerfiles are updated to use a new base image digest for the final runtime stage. The ubi9/ubi-minimal image digest is updated from fe688...e4df to 175baf...54cea in both files with no other functional changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Base Image Digest Update
Dockerfile, Dockerfile.dist
Updated the final stage base image digest from sha256:fe688...e4df to sha256:175baf...54cea for ubi9/ubi-minimal. No build logic or configuration changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess if the description relates to the changeset. Add a description explaining the purpose of the base image digest update, such as security patches or performance improvements.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title clearly summarizes the main change: updating the base image digest for the UBI (Universal Base Image) dependency.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Flag Coverage Δ
acceptance 55.21% <ø> (ø)
generative 17.90% <ø> (ø)
integration 26.65% <ø> (ø)
unit 69.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant