Repository navigation
Conversation
A hunter wrote "picker.test.ts is absent" while the file existed. The evidence protocol asked for file:line and an excerpt for a finding, but said nothing about findings that rest on something not existing. Such a finding now carries the command and its empty result (an ls listing, a grep count of 0). When the budget does not allow that call, the lead goes in the not-reached line as unverified, never as a finding. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner
Author
|
Grader: buzzdan/ldd-evals#44 |
Owner
Author
|
Closed: #91 (merged) makes the same fix, and it also requires the search over the whole repository. The budget clause of this PR is in #99. The grader buzzdan/ldd-evals#44 stays open and works with #91. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
A hunter finding that rests on something not existing (no test file, no caller, never imported) now carries the command that looked and its empty result as evidence: an
lslisting, or agrep … | wc -lthat prints0. When the budget does not allow that call, the lead goes in thenot reached:line asunverified: <claim>, never as a finding.Why
In the ts-react A/B, the R7 hunter wrote "picker.test.ts is absent" while
src/pages/Devices/placement/picker.test.tsexisted. The evidence protocol asked forfile:lineand an excerpt, but said nothing about claims of absence. This happens only sometimes: case C passed both baseline runs.Changes
core/agents/rule-hunter.md: a "Claims of absence" paragraph after the evidence protocol, and one line for it under the output block.Checks
task check,task lint-core,task docs:check: green.no-absent-test-claimto case C in all three suites.🤖 Generated with Claude Code