Skip to content

chore(deps): lock file maintenance - #2220

Closed
renovate[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance
Closed

renovate[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • Between 12:00 AM and 05:59 AM, only on Monday (* 0-5 * * 1)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from fca5e7c to 364b113 Compare September 7, 2026 12:10
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.74%. Comparing base (9068dd4) to head (0d856d9).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2220   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.74%   93.74%           
=======================================
  Files         181      181           
  Lines       12863    12865    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        12058    12060    +2     
  Misses        805      805           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 93.74% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from 364b113 to be1f1b5 Compare September 7, 2026 12:22

@vdusek vdusek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from be1f1b5 to 53bbf05 Compare September 7, 2026 12:40
@vdusek
vdusek marked this pull request as draft September 7, 2026 12:41
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from 0cac45b to 290acc8 Compare September 7, 2026 12:43
@vdusek
vdusek marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2026 12:45
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from 290acc8 to 91e4602 Compare September 7, 2026 12:49
@vdusek
vdusek marked this pull request as draft September 7, 2026 12:54
@renovate

renovate Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

… implementations

Since ty 0.0.74, `**kwargs: Unpack[TD]` with an open TypedDict also accepts
any undeclared keyword as `object`. An implementation that types such a
keyword is then not assignable to an overload that leaves it to `**kwargs`.
The `EnqueueLinksFunction` overloads now name the keywords of the other mode
typed `None`, which also makes `selector` and `requests` mutually exclusive
for ty. `Dataset.export_to` forwards `collect_all_keys` through `**kwargs`
instead of declaring it on the implementation, since only the CSV overload
declares it.
@vdusek

vdusek commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

closing in favor of #2225

@vdusek vdusek closed this Sep 9, 2026
vdusek added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2026
… implementations (#2225)

Bumps ty from 0.0.73 to 0.0.78 in the lock, and fixes the overloads that
bump breaks.

Since ty 0.0.74, `**kwargs: Unpack[TD]` over an open TypedDict is read
as also accepting any undeclared keyword as `object`. That extra
catch-all makes an implementation which types such a keyword
unassignable to an overload that leaves the keyword to `**kwargs`. On
master, ty 0.0.78 reports 4 diagnostics: the `EnqueueLinksFunction`
overloads, the assignability of the `enqueue_links` implementation to
that protocol, and `Dataset.export_to`.

Each `EnqueueLinksFunction` overload now also names the keywords of the
other mode, typed `None`. The implementation is assignable to both
overloads again, and `selector` and `requests` become mutually exclusive
for ty as well, which mypy and pyright already enforced.

`Dataset.export_to` no longer declares `collect_all_keys` on the
implementation. It flows through `**kwargs` into the CSV exporter, the
only one that takes it. Both overloads are unchanged.

The public API is untouched: same call signatures, no renamed or added
types. One runtime edge case changes. `export_to(key, 'json',
collect_all_keys=True)` used to ignore the flag and now raises
`TypeError` from `json.dump`, which is how every other CSV-only keyword
already behaved with JSON. mypy and pyright always rejected that call.

The source fix passes ty 0.0.73, 0.0.78 and 0.0.79, so it should survive
the next few bumps. mypy and pyright each lose diagnostics and gain
none. Once this lands, #2220 carries the rest of the lock refresh.

*✍️ Drafted by Claude Code*
@vdusek
vdusek deleted the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch September 14, 2026 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants