Skip to content

feat(rest): add scan plan endpoint support to REST catalog client - #783

Open
gsandeep1241 wants to merge 7 commits into
apache:mainfrom
gsandeep1241:sandeepg-scan-plan-endpoint-for-rest-catalog-client-2-impl
Open

gsandeep1241 wants to merge 7 commits into
apache:mainfrom
gsandeep1241:sandeepg-scan-plan-endpoint-for-rest-catalog-client-2-impl

Conversation

@gsandeep1241

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

When a table is loaded from a REST catalog that advertises the PlanTableScan endpoint, NewScan() now returns a RestTableScanBuilder whose Build() produces a RestTableScan. PlanFiles() on that scan delegates manifest resolution to the server via POST /plan, GET /plan/{id} (with exponential backoff), POST /tasks/{id}, and DELETE /plan/{id} (best-effort cancel), instead of reading manifests locally.

  • Add RestTable, RestTableScanBuilder, RestTableScan and RestScanContext
  • Promote DataTableScan::PlanFiles and TableScanBuilder::Build to virtual
  • Convert RestCatalog::client_ and paths_ to shared_ptr so RestScanContext can share ownership with live scans

Comment thread src/iceberg/catalog/rest/rest_catalog.cc Outdated
Comment thread src/iceberg/catalog/rest/rest_table_scan.cc
Comment thread src/iceberg/catalog/rest/rest_table_scan.cc
Comment thread src/iceberg/catalog/rest/rest_table_scan.cc Outdated
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@iceberg.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale label Aug 29, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time.

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Sep 5, 2026
@wgtmac

wgtmac commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hey @gsandeep1241, do you want to revive this?

@wgtmac wgtmac reopened this Sep 7, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the stale label Sep 8, 2026
@gsandeep1241

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@wgtmac Thanks for re-opening it. Apologies for the long delay, I'll get back on it this week - next set of changes should be out for review in the next couple of days!

Sandeep Gottimukkala and others added 3 commits September 13, 2026 12:45
When a table is loaded from a REST catalog that advertises the PlanTableScan
endpoint, NewScan() now returns a RestTableScanBuilder whose Build() produces
a RestTableScan. PlanFiles() on that scan delegates manifest resolution to
the server via POST /plan, GET /plan/{id} (with exponential backoff),
POST /tasks/{id}, and DELETE /plan/{id} (best-effort cancel), instead of
reading manifests locally.

- Add RestTable, RestTableScanBuilder, RestTableScan and RestScanContext
- Promote DataTableScan::PlanFiles and TableScanBuilder::Build to virtual
- Convert RestCatalog::client_ and paths_ to shared_ptr so RestScanContext
  can share ownership with live scans
- Cancel server-side plan when ResolveScanTasks fails partway through
- Propagate use_snapshot_schema from scan context to PlanTableScanRequest:
  true for UseSnapshot/AsOfTime/tag refs and incremental scans, false for
  branch refs and default scans
- Gate RestTable creation on effective scan-planning-mode config (table
  config overrides client config, default is client); error if server mode
  is requested but endpoint is not advertised
- Add ScanPlanningMode enum and ScanPlanningModeFrom() parser to
  RestCatalogProperties
- Make HttpClient methods virtual and add HttpResponse::MakeForTesting()
  to support unit test mocking
- Add tests: use_snapshot_schema in table_scan_test, ScanPlanningModeFrom
  parsing in catalog_properties_test, and RestTableScan HTTP flow tests
  in rest_table_scan_test
Upstream changed Table and DataTableScanBuilder constructors to require
full_name/table_name and MetricsReporter parameters. Updated RestTable,
RestTableScanBuilder, and their callers accordingly.
@gsandeep1241
gsandeep1241 force-pushed the sandeepg-scan-plan-endpoint-for-rest-catalog-client-2-impl branch from fb8da85 to d8a7d6c Compare September 13, 2026 19:53
Comment thread src/iceberg/catalog/rest/rest_catalog.cc Outdated
Comment thread src/iceberg/catalog/rest/rest_table_scan.cc
Comment thread src/iceberg/catalog/rest/rest_table_scan.cc Outdated
Comment thread src/iceberg/catalog/rest/rest_table_scan.cc
return IOError("Scan planning failed: {}",
result.error ? result.error->message : "unknown error");
case PlanStatus::kCancelled:
return IOError("Scan planning was cancelled for plan_id={}", plan_id);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to introduce a new error type? Or use InvalidArgument instead?

@gsandeep1241
gsandeep1241 requested a review from wgtmac September 13, 2026 21:33
@gsandeep1241
gsandeep1241 marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2026 21:38
@gsandeep1241
gsandeep1241 force-pushed the sandeepg-scan-plan-endpoint-for-rest-catalog-client-2-impl branch from 06fb014 to 2bab861 Compare September 13, 2026 22:18
Parse storage-credentials from PlanTableScanResponse,
FetchPlanningResultResponse, and FetchScanTasksResponse. When credentials
are present, build a scan-scoped FileIO via MakeTableFileIO and expose it
through RestTableScan::effective_io() for callers to use when reading
the returned scan tasks.
@gsandeep1241
gsandeep1241 force-pushed the sandeepg-scan-plan-endpoint-for-rest-catalog-client-2-impl branch from 2bab861 to bcc9da4 Compare September 13, 2026 22:48
Sandeep Gottimukkala added 3 commits September 13, 2026 15:58
RestTableScanBuilder::Build() calls context_.Validate() across the
iceberg_rest/iceberg library boundary. Without ICEBERG_EXPORT on
TableScanContext the symbol is hidden in the shared library and the
linker fails on arm64.
…port

MSVC does not export the implicitly-generated move constructor of a
template class instantiation. RestTableScanBuilder (introduced in
iceberg_rest) is exported with ICEBERG_REST_EXPORT, so its compiler-
generated move constructor must call the base TableScanBuilder move
constructor as an imported symbol. Explicitly defaulting it makes it
part of the explicit template instantiation and therefore exported.
@gsandeep1241

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hey @gsandeep1241, do you want to revive this?

Thanks @wgtmac for reviving this! This is now ready for review. Please take a look when you can :)

RestScanContext rest_context);

/// \brief Plans files via the REST scan planning endpoints.
Result<std::vector<std::shared_ptr<FileScanTask>>> PlanFiles() const override;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After #873, callers can use PlanFilesStream(). This class only overrides PlanFiles(), so the stream path still reads manifests locally and never calls /plan. This bypasses server-side planning.

/// If the server vended storage credentials during planning, returns a FileIO
/// initialised with those credentials; otherwise returns the table's FileIO.
/// Must be called after PlanFiles().
const std::shared_ptr<FileIO>& effective_io() const;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The scan is returned as std::unique_ptr<DataTableScan>, but DataTableScan::io() is not virtual and still returns the table IO. A normal caller cannot reach effective_io() without a downcast, so the vended credentials are not used by the normal read path.

auto start = std::chrono::steady_clock::now();

for (int retry = 0; retry <= kMaxRetries; ++retry) {
ICEBERG_ASSIGN_OR_RAISE(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After a plan-id exists, any GET, JSON parse, or response validation error here returns without calling CancelPlanning(). The server may keep the plan resources.


Status RestTableScan::ApplyStorageCredentials(
const std::vector<StorageCredential>& credentials) const {
if (credentials.empty()) return {};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

An empty credential list leaves scan_io_ unchanged. If this scan is planned twice and only the first response has credentials, the second result still uses the old credentials.


/// \brief Returns a RestTableScanBuilder that will delegate PlanFiles() to the
/// REST catalog server.
Result<std::unique_ptr<DataTableScanBuilder>> NewScan() const override;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This only overrides NewScan(). NewIncrementalAppendScan() and NewIncrementalChangelogScan() still use the base table path and plan manifests locally, even when scan-planning-mode=server.


EXPECT_CALL(*mock_client_, Post(_, _, _, _, _))
.WillOnce(Return(HttpResponse::MakeForTesting(200, std::string(kSubmittedBody))));
EXPECT_CALL(*mock_client_, Get(_, _, _, _, _))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no case where a plan-id is returned and the poll GET, JSON parsing, or response validation fails. Those errors currently skip cancellation.

MakeContext(std::nullopt));
builder.UseSnapshot(kSnapshotId);
ICEBERG_UNWRAP_OR_FAIL(auto scan, builder.Build());
EXPECT_TRUE(scan->context().use_snapshot_schema);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This checks the builder context, not the JSON sent to the server. None of the POST expectations inspect the body, so request fields can be missing and these tests still pass.

ICEBERG_UNWRAP_OR_FAIL(auto tasks, scan->PlanFiles());
EXPECT_TRUE(tasks.empty());

auto* rest_scan = dynamic_cast<RestTableScan*>(scan.get());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This downcast hides the public API problem. Real callers hold a DataTableScan and use io(), which still returns the original table IO.

// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// No storage credentials: effective_io() falls back to the table's FileIO.
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST_F(RestTableScanTest, NoStorageCredentialsEffectiveIoFallsBackToTableIO) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This uses a fresh scan. It does not catch stale credentials when the same scan is planned twice, first with credentials and then without them.

// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// RestTable::NewScan returns a RestTableScanBuilder (not a plain builder).
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST_F(RestTableScanTest, RestTableNewScanReturnsRestTableScanBuilder) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This builds RestTable directly. It does not cover RestCatalog::LoadTable() choosing the scan type from client and table scan-planning-mode, or the missing-endpoint error.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants