Skip to content

Update vmware reservations description - #3358

Merged
yadvr merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
andrijapanicsb-patch-2
May 30, 2019
Merged

Update vmware reservations description#3358
yadvr merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
andrijapanicsb-patch-2

Conversation

@andrijapanicsb

@andrijapanicsb andrijapanicsb commented May 25, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

we do NOT always reserve VMware CPU/RAM resources - only when "vmware.reserve.cpu" or "vmware.reserve.mem" setting is set to TRUE - AND we do so, irelevant if overprovisioning is active or not. Verified for both system VMs and user VMs.

Description

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

CPU and RAM overprovisioning was active (set to 2.0), while vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem was set to TRUE or FALSE and the end result was observed in vCenter (6.5).
The same test repeated, with CPU and RAM overprovisioning set to 1.0 (no overprovisioning).

we do NOT always reserve VMware CPU/RAM resources - only when this setting is set to TRUE - verified for both system VMs and user VMs.
@yadvr

yadvr commented May 27, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM @andrijapanicsb should we say in the descripotion that when the global settings are true, the reservation value is considered based on the overprovisioning factors.

@yadvr yadvr modified the milestones: 4.11.3.0, 4.13.0.0 May 27, 2019
@yadvr

yadvr commented May 30, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, merging based on Travis job#1 because the change is strictly in static string description and does not require full regression test run.

@yadvr
yadvr merged commit 964430a into master May 30, 2019
@andrijapanicsb
andrijapanicsb deleted the andrijapanicsb-patch-2 branch April 3, 2020 19:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants