Skip to content

[CI] Auto add license headers to conf files with pre-commit - #12926

Open
jbampton wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
jbampton:conf-autoadd-license-headers
Open

[CI] Auto add license headers to conf files with pre-commit#12926
jbampton wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
jbampton:conf-autoadd-license-headers

Conversation

@jbampton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

This PR is similar to other PRs where license headers have been auto added with pre-commit.

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

Ran pre-commit run --all-files both before and after the license headers were auto inserted.

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 19.73%. Comparing base (4e4a26b) to head (1c84f6b).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12926      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     19.73%   19.73%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    19956    19953       -3     
============================================
  Files          6371     6371              
  Lines        575765   575765              
  Branches      70478    70478              
============================================
- Hits         113642   113631      -11     
- Misses       449766   449780      +14     
+ Partials      12357    12354       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.41% <ø> (ø)
unittests 21.01% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jbampton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jbampton a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17304

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

good work @jbampton , two observations:

  1. I think this doesn’t hit production code so blueorangutan is not going to make us wiser.
  2. Did you remove any from the exclusion list in the pom.xml (and should we)?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR is stale because it has been open for 120 days with no activity. It may be removed by administrators of this project at any time. Remove the stale label or comment to request for removal of it to prevent this.

@DaanHoogland
DaanHoogland force-pushed the conf-autoadd-license-headers branch from a9b3b94 to 1c84f6b Compare August 25, 2026 08:01
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 25, 2026 08:01

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants