Allow filtering hook-collected assets in OpenLineage emission policy - #71312
Open
ramitkataria wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Allow filtering hook-collected assets in OpenLineage emission policy#71312ramitkataria wants to merge 2 commits into
ramitkataria wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Hook-level lineage registers an output asset for every object a hook writes, so a task that writes many objects reports one asset per object. The existing hook_lineage control is all-or-nothing: suppressing the noisy assets also loses the ones worth tracking from the same hook, and the collector cannot tell the two apart once its assets are read as one set. Filtering by asset URI or reporting hook class lets a Dag keep the lineage that matters while dropping the noise, and doing it where hook lineage is consumed covers every instrumented hook at once rather than one provider at a time. Note this reduces what gets reported rather than what gets collected, so it does not recover assets already dropped by max_assets_per_collector. closes: apache#63371
Translating an Airflow asset to an OpenLineage dataset needs the scheme's converter from the provider that owns it. The amazon provider is not a dev dependency of the openlineage provider, so s3 URIs do not translate in the lowest-dependencies CI job and every assertion about collected s3 assets fails there.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hook-level lineage registers an output asset for every object a hook writes, so a task that writes many objects reports one asset per object. The existing hook_lineage control is all-or-nothing: suppressing the noisy assets also loses the ones worth tracking from the same hook, and the collector cannot tell the two apart once its assets are read as one set.
Filtering by asset URI or reporting hook class lets a Dag keep the lineage that matters while dropping the noise, and doing it where hook lineage is consumed covers every instrumented hook at once rather than one provider at a time.
Note this reduces what gets reported rather than what gets collected, so it does not recover assets already dropped by max_assets_per_collector.
closes: #63371
cc @SamWheating @kacpermuda @ashb @vincbeck @shnhdan @eladkal @mobuchowski
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.