Repository navigation
Conversation
Collaborator
|
LoopForge PR Review — head
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Users who installed with
git cloneandbash scripts/install.shneed a documented upgrade path, and releasing a tag should verify that path with existing user data.Scope
Compatibility
Applies to the published-image Compose installation. Existing
.envvalues, secrets, data paths and the Compose project name are retained. The first upgrade of a legacy installation adopts its existing platform container's hostname, including stopped containers; if that container was removed, operators must supply the previous workspace hostname as documented. No schema or data migration is added, and historical SQL migrations remain manual.The gate selects the greatest earlier published stable platform version, excluding Local history, drafts and prereleases. Missing baselines fail except for the first platform release. Failed acceptance can leave the versioned image available, but does not promote mutable tags or create a GitHub Release.
Validation
After rebasing onto current
main:python3 scripts/test-install.py -v— 37 passed.python3 scripts/test-release-upgrade.py -v— 6 passed.bash -n scripts/install.sh scripts/configure.sh scripts/test-upgrade.sh— passed.node --check e2e/upgrade-persistence.mjs— passed.git diff --check origin/main...HEAD— passed.python3 scripts/check-public.py— passed.bash scripts/scan-secrets.sh— passed; no leaks found.GitHub Actions validation with actionlint passed during implementation. Real Docker acceptance installed official v0.3.3 through its installer, then used the changed installer/Compose configuration with the official 0.3.4 image verified against its published manifest. Retained data, old SOP continuation, new SOP execution and repeated installation passed; disposable resources were cleaned up. This local acceptance used released binaries; it did not build an unreleased platform binary or re-run the live scenario after rebasing. The tag workflow validates the newly built image digest. Details are recorded in
docs/validation.md.Full Go/frontend/Local suites were not run for these deployment and installer changes. No tag or release was published.
Safety
Classic bundles and third-party licensing changes are not applicable.