TanStack AI version
@tanstack/ai-client 0.36.1 and 0.37.0 — reproduced against clean npm installations of both. Originally observed through @tanstack/ai-react 0.29.4.
Framework/Library version
Originally observed in React Native with an AsyncStorage-backed ChatClientPersistence adapter. The isolated reproduction below uses Node.js 24.14.1, with no React, native runtime, server, or model API required.
Describe the bug and the steps to reproduce it
An in-flight chat does not reconnect after a cold start when the asynchronous persistence read completes before the view calls client.attach().
The transcript restores successfully, but connection.joinRun() is never called. The partial assistant message therefore remains frozen even though the server still owns the generation and its replay log. Attaching before the same async read resolves works.
- Persist a combined
{ messages, resume: { resumeState: { threadId, runId } } } record for an in-flight run, with no pending interrupts.
- Construct a fresh
ChatClient with an asynchronous getItem and a connection supporting joinRun.
- Let
getItem resolve before mounting/attaching the view.
- Call
client.attach().
- Observe that the messages are restored, but no rejoin occurs.
Expected: construction/hydration performs no network I/O before attachment; after attachment, the client joins the restored run exactly once, regardless of whether storage or attachment happened first.
Actual: only the attachment-first ordering calls joinRun. Storage-first restores the transcript but permanently skips the rejoin for that mount.
Your Minimal, Reproducible Example - (Sandbox Highly Recommended)
Self-contained executable reproduction below. It does not require application code, API keys, or a running backend.
In an empty directory:
npm init -y
npm install @tanstack/ai-client@0.37.0
# Save the following as repro.mjs
node repro.mjs
The same failure occurs with @tanstack/ai-client@0.36.1.
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
import { setTimeout as delay } from 'node:timers/promises';
import { ChatClient } from '@tanstack/ai-client';
async function check(restoreBeforeAttach) {
const joined = [];
const snapshot = {
messages: [{ id: 'user-1', role: 'user', parts: [{ type: 'text', content: 'Hello' }] }],
resume: { resumeState: { threadId: 'thread-1', runId: 'run-1' } },
};
const client = new ChatClient({
threadId: 'thread-1',
persistence: {
getItem: async () => structuredClone(snapshot),
setItem: async () => {},
removeItem: async () => {},
},
connection: {
async *connect() { throw new Error('A restore must not start a new generation'); },
async *joinRun(runId) {
joined.push(runId);
yield { type: 'RUN_STARTED', threadId: 'thread-1', runId, timestamp: Date.now() };
yield { type: 'TEXT_MESSAGE_START', messageId: 'reply-1', role: 'assistant', timestamp: Date.now() };
yield { type: 'TEXT_MESSAGE_CONTENT', messageId: 'reply-1', delta: 'Resumed reply', timestamp: Date.now() };
yield { type: 'TEXT_MESSAGE_END', messageId: 'reply-1', timestamp: Date.now() };
yield { type: 'RUN_FINISHED', threadId: 'thread-1', runId, timestamp: Date.now() };
},
},
});
try {
if (restoreBeforeAttach) {
await delay(0); // Async storage resolves before the view's mount effect.
assert.equal(client.getMessages().length, 1); // Transcript restored successfully.
}
client.attach();
await delay(50);
assert.deepEqual(joined, ['run-1'], `restoreBeforeAttach=${restoreBeforeAttach}`);
console.log(`PASS restoreBeforeAttach=${restoreBeforeAttach}`);
} finally {
client.detach();
client.dispose();
}
}
await check(false); // Control: attach first, then storage resolves. Passes.
await check(true); // Bug: storage resolves first. joinRun is never called.
Observed output on both unpatched versions:
PASS restoreBeforeAttach=false
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: restoreBeforeAttach=true
+ actual - expected
+ []
- [ 'run-1' ]
Root cause
In packages/ai-client/src/chat-client.ts:
- Constructor-time
rejoinRunId is populated from synchronously restored state (or initialResumeSnapshot). An async persistence read leaves it unset.
applyPersistedResume() receives the async snapshot and calls maybeRejoinInFlight(runId).
- If the view has not attached yet,
maybeRejoinInFlight() returns because tailing is false. This guard is correct: an unmounted/discarded client must not open a connection.
- The async run ID is not retained for a later attachment.
attach() checks the constructor-time rejoinRunId, so it has no pending rejoin to perform.
Suggested fix and validation
Retain a bare in-flight run ID when async hydration completes, so attach() can consume it later. The core change tested locally is:
- private readonly rejoinRunId: string | null | undefined
+ private rejoinRunId: string | null | undefined
private applyPersistedResume(snapshot: ChatResumeSnapshot): void {
this.applyResumeSnapshot(snapshot)
const hasInterrupts =
Array.isArray(snapshot.pendingInterrupts) &&
snapshot.pendingInterrupts.length > 0
const runId = snapshot.resumeState?.runId
+ this.rejoinRunId = hasInterrupts ? null : runId
if (!hasInterrupts && runId) {
this.maybeRejoinInFlight(runId)
}
}
I verified that adding the equivalent assignment to the published 0.37.0 runtime makes both cases in the standalone reproduction pass. A complete fix should also keep this remembered ID current and clear it when the run becomes terminal, rather than leaving a stale constructor-era ID for later reattachments. Interrupt-only snapshots should retain their existing behavior instead of being automatically tailed.
The application-level regression test also recreates the client from a frozen JSON storage snapshot and routes the real client through a durable NDJSON backend. It checks both storage/attachment orderings, replay without a second generation POST, and no duplicate assistant text. Model output is simulated.
Related reports checked
Screenshots or Videos (Optional)
The executable assertions above reproduce the failure without a UI.
Do you intend to try to help solve this bug with your own PR?
A tested local workaround and reproduction are included above; no PR is being opened with this report.
Terms & Code of Conduct
TanStack AI version
@tanstack/ai-client0.36.1 and 0.37.0 — reproduced against clean npm installations of both. Originally observed through@tanstack/ai-react0.29.4.Framework/Library version
Originally observed in React Native with an AsyncStorage-backed
ChatClientPersistenceadapter. The isolated reproduction below uses Node.js 24.14.1, with no React, native runtime, server, or model API required.Describe the bug and the steps to reproduce it
An in-flight chat does not reconnect after a cold start when the asynchronous persistence read completes before the view calls
client.attach().The transcript restores successfully, but
connection.joinRun()is never called. The partial assistant message therefore remains frozen even though the server still owns the generation and its replay log. Attaching before the same async read resolves works.{ messages, resume: { resumeState: { threadId, runId } } }record for an in-flight run, with no pending interrupts.ChatClientwith an asynchronousgetItemand a connection supportingjoinRun.getItemresolve before mounting/attaching the view.client.attach().Expected: construction/hydration performs no network I/O before attachment; after attachment, the client joins the restored run exactly once, regardless of whether storage or attachment happened first.
Actual: only the attachment-first ordering calls
joinRun. Storage-first restores the transcript but permanently skips the rejoin for that mount.Your Minimal, Reproducible Example - (Sandbox Highly Recommended)
Self-contained executable reproduction below. It does not require application code, API keys, or a running backend.
In an empty directory:
npm init -y npm install @tanstack/ai-client@0.37.0 # Save the following as repro.mjs node repro.mjsThe same failure occurs with
@tanstack/ai-client@0.36.1.Observed output on both unpatched versions:
Root cause
In
packages/ai-client/src/chat-client.ts:rejoinRunIdis populated from synchronously restored state (orinitialResumeSnapshot). An async persistence read leaves it unset.applyPersistedResume()receives the async snapshot and callsmaybeRejoinInFlight(runId).maybeRejoinInFlight()returns becausetailingis false. This guard is correct: an unmounted/discarded client must not open a connection.attach()checks the constructor-timerejoinRunId, so it has no pending rejoin to perform.Suggested fix and validation
Retain a bare in-flight run ID when async hydration completes, so
attach()can consume it later. The core change tested locally is:I verified that adding the equivalent assignment to the published 0.37.0 runtime makes both cases in the standalone reproduction pass. A complete fix should also keep this remembered ID current and clear it when the run becomes terminal, rather than leaving a stale constructor-era ID for later reattachments. Interrupt-only snapshots should retain their existing behavior instead of being automatically tailed.
The application-level regression test also recreates the client from a frozen JSON storage snapshot and routes the real client through a durable NDJSON backend. It checks both storage/attachment orderings, replay without a second generation POST, and no duplicate assistant text. Model output is simulated.
Related reports checked
joinRunrejoin never drains post-stream actions, stalling a client-tool turn and blocking all later sends #1058 concerns draining queued actions after a rejoined client-tool run. HerejoinRunis never called in the first place.Screenshots or Videos (Optional)
The executable assertions above reproduce the failure without a UI.
Do you intend to try to help solve this bug with your own PR?
A tested local workaround and reproduction are included above; no PR is being opened with this report.
Terms & Code of Conduct