Repository navigation
ripemd: fix RIPEMD-128 round count in comment - #931
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The parallel-round comment in c128.rs says the parallel rounds are "the same as the previous five rounds", but RIPEMD-128 only has four rounds: process_block! expands Round 1–4 followed by Parallel Round 1–4.
The sentence was copied from c160.rs, where it is correct — RIPEMD-160 does have a Round 5 (c160.rs:70).
Comment-only change, no behavior change. cargo test -p ripemd passes.