Skip to content

[Docs] Correct judgment model guidance grammar - #3147

Merged
mrubens merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/copy-clarity-3bs90zg9mco77
Sep 23, 2026
Merged

mrubens merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/copy-clarity-3bs90zg9mco77

Conversation

@roomote-community

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

​Opened on behalf of @mrubens. Follow up by mentioning @roomote, in the web UI, or in Discord.

What changed

  • rewrite the judgment-model documentation bullet as a complete sentence that clearly explains the advisory diff-risk ranking
  • clarify that the diff-risk tool returns a result with available: false when no hosted judgment model is configured

Why this change was made

Both recently added descriptions contained malformed prose that obscured the intended behavior. The corrections keep the existing judgment-model and tool contracts unchanged.

Impact

Public documentation and developer-facing tool guidance now describe the diff-risk pre-screen clearly. There is no runtime behavior change.

Screenshots

Representative rendering of the corrected judgment-model documentation bullet

Representative rendering on the configured local docs origin. The Mintlify preview returned an internal server error after hot reload, so this demonstrates the corrected copy's readability rather than the real preview runtime.

@roomote-community

roomote-community Bot commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

No code issues found. See task

Reviewed 398a4ba

@mrubens
mrubens marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2026 04:17
@mrubens
mrubens merged commit a086427 into develop Sep 23, 2026
19 checks passed
@mrubens
mrubens deleted the fix/copy-clarity-3bs90zg9mco77 branch September 23, 2026 04:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant