Skip to content

Simplify namd analysis with inmem FOM - #1847

Closed
linsword13 wants to merge 1 commit into
Ramble-Project:developfrom
linsword13:inmem-fom-cleanup
Closed

linsword13 wants to merge 1 commit into
Ramble-Project:developfrom
linsword13:inmem-fom-cleanup

Conversation

@linsword13

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Lin Guo <linsword13@gmail.com>
@ramble-project-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Ramble Performance Test Metrics

Results produced with commit: d0dc758

Test Name Outcome Duration (s) Most Recent Run (s) Last 5 Avg (s)
test_analyze_large_file passed 1.0324 1.0473 (6fd9c0d) 1.0494
test_large_template_expansion passed 1.1440 1.0966 (6fd9c0d) 1.1253
test_many_experiments passed 27.7558 26.7128 (6fd9c0d) 27.4622
test_many_objects_defaults passed 15.0832 14.0638 (6fd9c0d) 14.7654
test_matrix_filter_perf passed 1.0208 0.9516 (6fd9c0d) 1.0160

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@linsword13

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

After thinking about it more, it feels this is a case where having derived FOMs would really simplify the analysis. Closing this for now.

@linsword13 linsword13 closed this Oct 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant