[codex] Improve open source documentation governance#5
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 95f367cf4b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| - Contact the maintainer directly at GitHub: `@Pigbibi`. | ||
| - If private vulnerability reporting is enabled for this repository, prefer that channel. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Provide an actual private reporting channel
When GitHub private vulnerability reporting is not enabled for this repository, this policy tells reporters not to open a public issue but only gives a GitHub username; GitHub mentions/profile pages are not a guaranteed private contact mechanism. That leaves no actionable confidential path for credential or workflow-token disclosures, so the policy should include a concrete private channel or require enabling GitHub private vulnerability reporting.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
Validation