Mint four docket-only placeholders for the thesis bills wave

[MaxGhenis]

What

Seven registry mints, superseded=0, suspects=0; catalog 209 → 216 with
all 209 prior bindings unchanged (--check green, reviewed uuid-map
anchor adopted in the same diff per the pinning ceremony).

Four docket-only placeholders for the thesis bills full-coverage
wave — thesis#159
merged the verified ingestion requests; the usaspending-api transform
extensions are in review on the thesis side (implementation, tests,
anchors, and docket admission were still outstanding at mint time, and
the seeds say so). The defining filter is carried in each concept
identity so a differently filtered series can never enrich these
lineages (round-1 review's parallel-UUID concern):

Concept	Bill page	Scope caveat in the seed
usaspending.cdfi.assistance_transaction_obligations	S. 2718 (CDFI)	awarding-subtier assistance-transaction context, not the assistance the bill would authorize
usaspending.ondcp.hidta_al95001_obligations	S. 767 (HIDTA)	whole AL 95.001 aggregate, not a §707(s) supplemental metric
usaspending.ntia.broadband_al11038_obligations	H.R. 2449 (FUTURE Networks)	AL 11.038 advanced-wireless context, not a 6G Task Force metric
usaspending.usfs.minnesota_place_of_performance_obligations	H.R. 978 (Superior NF)	Minnesota-wide — no named-forest filter exists; NOT Superior NF obligations. Geography decision stated in the seed: country-level by seed-schema design; the MN scope lives in the concept string, so a future state-geography series is a distinct identity

All four: usd_millions, annual, status: docket-only, following the
SBA precedent (#150).

Plus three deterministic auto-mints: the observed BLS CES
defense-employment identities whose first prints were recorded
2026-08-10 ahead of their catalog rows.

Review trail (three rounds, branch rewritten pre-merge)

1. Round 1: concepts broadened past the thesis series definitions
   (parallel-UUID risk) → identities now carry their defining filters;
   USFS geography decision made explicitly; extension-status wording
   corrected; CES date corrected to 2026-08-10.
2. Round 2: one residual wording instance in the anchor rationale →
   fixed (comment-only amend, no digest/pin/data change).
3. Round 3: clean two-commit ceremony, no stale wording in the branch,
   catalog suite 155 passed, builder check green.

Verification

• Rebuild + --check: catalog current, 216 series.
• tests/test_build_series_catalog.py: 155 passed (count pin 209→216,
  anchor bf17abbe… adopted with dated rationale).
• Pre-existing, unrelated: 6 test_receipt_shim_transparency failures,
  identical on the untouched branch head (receipt-version drift).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code