Enable Typing and generics based typing to support PEP585

[arhamchopra]

Motivation

PEP 585 — and the tooling that enforces it (ruff rule UP006, pyupgrade, …) — rewrites the classic
typing generics to their builtin equivalents in annotations: typing.List[X] → list[X],
typing.Dict[K, V] → dict[K, V], and so on.

csp's type-introspection layer treated a time-series built from a builtin generic as a different
type from the same time-series built from the typing form:

ts[list[int]] == ts[typing.List[int]]              # False  (should be True)
ts[dict[str, int]] == ts[typing.Dict[str, int]]    # False
hash(ts[list[int]]) == hash(ts[typing.List[int]])  # False

Because csp.const([...]) (and type inference generally) emits the typing form while a modernized
annotation becomes the builtin form, any code that compares time-series types with a strict == broke
after a routine List → list autoformat. Concretely, in csp-gateway, GatewayChannels.set_channel
validates an edge against the declared channel type with ==:

TypeError: Edge type incorrect for my_list_channel:
  should be TsType[list[MyStruct]], found TsType[typing.List[MyStruct]]

This produced 258 such failures across the csp-gateway test suite. The clean fix belongs in csp:
ts[list[X]] and ts[typing.List[X]] should be the same type.

Root cause

TsType.__class_getitem__ normalizes its parameter through
ContainerTypeNormalizer.normalize_type, but for an already-parametrized generic the normalizer returned
the type unchanged, so list[int] and typing.List[int] yielded two distinct Protocol[...]
specializations that were neither == nor hash-equal.

csp's graph-wiring / type-resolution path already treated the two origins as equivalent (via
CspTypingUtils._ORIGIN_COMPAT_MAP and get_origin, which map list → typing.List, etc.), which is
why graphs ran fine — this was an internal inconsistency in how TsType objects were built and
compared, not a real semantic incompatibility.

What this PR does

Canonicalizes builtin (PEP 585) container generics to their typing equivalents, recursively, so both
spellings normalize to a single representation that compares and hashes equal.

Direction chosen: builtin → typing, because that is the representation csp inference already emits, so
it is the lowest-blast-radius option. (Moving the canonical form toward the builtins is the more "modern"
long-term direction and is left for a follow-up — see Limitations.)

Specifically, ContainerTypeNormalizer:

• Remaps list / set / dict / tuple → typing.List / Set / Dict / Tuple at any nesting
  depth.
• Recurses through unions (X | None and typing.Optional[...]) and through preserved wrappers
  (typing.Mapping, FastList, Callable, csp.typing numpy array types, custom generics): builtin
  containers nested inside them are canonicalized while the wrapper keeps its own origin/flavor.
• Canonicalizes a bare string argument inside a generic (list["T"]) to a stable typing.ForwardRef
  (matching how typing.List["T"] is stored) rather than minting a fresh TypeVar on each call.
• Returns the original object unchanged when nothing actually changed, to avoid needless allocations and
  to preserve object identity for callers.

It also makes csp.snap / csp.snapkey scalar validation normalize the expected type and compare with
== instead of is (pydantic_types.make_snap_validator and
instantiation_type_resolver._is_scalar_value_matching_spec). This keeps container-typed snaps working
regardless of the list vs typing.List spelling, and also fixes a pre-existing failure where a snap
into a builtin-form-annotated scalar (x: list[int]) was already rejected.

Behavior

# before  ->  after
ts[list[int]] == ts[typing.List[int]]                    # False -> True
ts[dict[str, int]] == ts[typing.Dict[str, int]]          # False -> True
ts[set[int]] == ts[typing.Set[int]]                      # False -> True
ts[tuple[int, str]] == ts[typing.Tuple[int, str]]        # False -> True
ts[list[dict[str, int]]] == ts[List[Dict[str, int]]]     # False -> True  (nested)
ts[list[int] | None] == ts[Optional[List[int]]]          # False -> True  (union)
hash(ts[list[int]]) == hash(ts[typing.List[int]])        # False -> True
csp.const([1, 2, 3]).tstype == ts[list[int]]             # False -> True  (the csp-gateway symptom)

Current state

• Full non-adapter test suite: 1079 passed / 25 skipped / 2 xfailed. Lint + format clean.
• New regression coverage in csp/tests/impl/types/test_tstype.py: equality + hash parity for all four
  containers, deep nesting, unions, Mapping/FastList/Callable recursion, ForwardRef args, identity
  preservation, empty tuple, and a node-binding end-to-end test; plus a csp.snap builtin-generic scalar
  test in csp/tests/test_dynamic.py.

Limitations / explicitly out of scope

• Bare, unparametrized aliases are not unified: ts[list] != ts[typing.List] (likewise dict/set/
  tuple). Their natural canonical direction is the opposite — empty/untyped inference (csp.const([]))
  yields the builtin list, not typing.List — and normalizing them touches the C++ actual-type boundary
  (normalized_type_to_actual_python_type(typing.List) returns typing.List, not the list class). This
  is deferred to a follow-up to keep this change focused and low-risk.
• abc ↔ typing wrapper unification is not performed: e.g. collections.abc.Mapping[...] vs
  typing.Mapping[...], or collections.abc.Callable[...] vs typing.Callable[...], remain distinct
  (they are distinct at the Python level, and csp only bridges the four standard containers via
  _ORIGIN_COMPAT_MAP). Builtin containers nested inside such wrappers are still canonicalized; only the
  outer abc-vs-typing distinction remains.
• Top-level PEP 604 unions (ts[int | None] == ts[typing.Optional[int]]) already compared equal and
  are unchanged.

References

• PEP 585 — Type Hinting Generics In Standard Collections
• PEP 604 — Allow writing union types as X | Y
• ruff rule UP006 (non-pep585-annotation) — the modernization that surfaces this
• Touched: csp/impl/types/container_type_normalizer.py,
  csp/impl/types/pydantic_types.py, csp/impl/types/instantiation_type_resolver.py