Skip to content

Select node installation behavior from Provider declarations - #586

Merged
SaladDay merged 1 commit into
aos/cutoverfrom
aos/node-provider-installation-table
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

SaladDay merged 1 commit into
aos/cutoverfrom
aos/node-provider-installation-table

Conversation

@SaladDay

@SaladDay SaladDay commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The node installer now selects host checks, service-user checks, native configuration, Runtime preparation and service dependencies from one Provider table. Its supported node Providers come from the existing generated deployment declaration, removing repeated lists and implicit fallback to microsandbox for unknown Providers.

The refactor preserves device/group restrictions, check order before host changes, native store ownership, immutable image verification, generation helpers and uninstall recovery. The Python suite retains its existing assertions and adds coverage for declaration consistency, unsupported Providers and failure ordering.

Validation: complete Python node suite, 140 passed and two environment skips (root-only helper transfer and unavailable keyctl); Go Providers, 450 passed and one missing-database skip; focused declaration/artifact checks, 32 passed with no skips; distribution manifest, 28 passed. Full coordinator review and AST comparison of moved behavior completed. No database or native execution behavior changes; final live qualification remains with the cutover integration lane.

Fresh independent review found no substantiated in-scope issues. Rebasing onto cutover after #584 preserved the complete patch and identical node sources.

All applicable PR checks passed: distribution/installer packaging, hygiene, plan and the aggregate gate. Other groups were excluded by the repository’s path-based CI selection.

@SaladDay
SaladDay merged commit 1536ab0 into aos/cutover Oct 8, 2026
14 checks passed
@SaladDay
SaladDay deleted the aos/node-provider-installation-table branch October 8, 2026 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant