⚡ Bolt: File.toPath() 중복 호출 최적화

[seonghobae]

💡 What: write_index_file 함수 내에서 curr_dir.toPath() 결과를 currDirPath 지역 변수에 할당하여 재사용하도록 변경했습니다.
🎯 Why: File.toPath()를 불필요하게 반복 호출하는 것을 방지하여 코드의 가독성과 의도를 명확하게 합니다.
📊 Impact: File.toPath()는 내부적으로 캐싱되므로 런타임 성능 향상 효과는 없지만 불필요한 메서드 호출 오버헤드를 줄입니다.
🔬 Measurement: ./gradlew test jacocoTestReport를 통해 기존 기능과 100% 테스트 커버리지가 유지되는지 확인할 수 있습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 7051793173291040201 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 15 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d8e7afa0-3d98-4593-af19-904eabb1c14d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between efde64c and d0ca388.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .jules/bolt.md
• src/main/kotlin/html4tree/main.kt

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Closing as non-material churn on the same write_index_file region now owned by #393. The PR body itself acknowledges File.toPath() is internally cached and claims no runtime performance gain, while the bot journal incorrectly states repeated calls allocate new path/provider state. Without a benchmark or buyer-visible contract this adds merge conflict surface for a readability-only local variable; preserve the current focused atomic-publication work instead.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as non-material churn on the same write_index_file region now owned by #393. The PR body itself acknowledges File.toPath() is internally cached and claims no runtime performance gain, while the bot journal incorrectly states repeated calls allocate new path/provider state. Without a benchmark or buyer-visible contract this adds merge conflict surface for a readability-only local variable; preserve the current focused atomic-publication work instead.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is non-material churn and stopping work on this task.