🎨 Palette: 장식용 아이콘에 aria-hidden 속성 추가

[seonghobae]

💡 What: 네비게이션 및 아코디언 컴포넌트 내 순수 장식용 Chevron 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true" 속성을 추가했습니다.
🎯 Why: 스크린 리더가 불필요한 장식용 아이콘의 이름을 읽지 않도록 하여 접근성(Accessibility)을 향상시키기 위함입니다.
📸 Before/After: 스크린 리더에서 불필요한 아이콘 낭독 제거
♿ Accessibility: ContextSection, WeekNavigator, Pagination 컴포넌트의 시각적 장식 요소에 명시적인 숨김 처리 적용

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 17874831167615438461 started by @seonghobae

Summary by CodeRabbit

• 접근성 개선
  • 화면 낭독기가 장식용 아이콘을 불필요하게 읽지 않도록 보고서, 주간 탐색, 페이지네이션의 화살표 아이콘을 개선했습니다.
  • 키보드 및 보조기기 사용 시 탐색 경험이 더 명확해졌습니다.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: bd04d2c8-ab64-43ec-b379-f97bdd585b38

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f8796e and b7704e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• packages/web/src/components/dashboard/reports/context-section.tsx
• packages/web/src/components/dashboard/reports/week-navigator.tsx
• packages/web/src/components/ui/pagination.tsx

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

보고서 컨텍스트, 주간 탐색기, 페이지네이션의 장식용 방향 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true"를 추가했습니다.

Changes

장식 아이콘 접근성

Layer / File(s)	Summary
장식 아이콘의 접근성 트리 제외 packages/web/src/components/dashboard/reports/context-section.tsx, packages/web/src/components/dashboard/reports/week-navigator.tsx, packages/web/src/components/ui/pagination.tsx	각 컴포넌트의 방향 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true"를 추가했습니다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• ContextualWisdomLab/argos#330: 동일한 세 컴포넌트의 Chevron 아이콘에 같은 속성을 추가합니다.
• ContextualWisdomLab/argos#374: context-section.tsx의 장식 아이콘에 같은 속성을 추가합니다.
• ContextualWisdomLab/argos#317: 다른 웹 UI 컴포넌트의 장식 아이콘 접근성을 수정합니다.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	제목은 장식용 아이콘에 aria-hidden 속성을 추가한 주요 변경 사항을 정확하고 간결하게 설명합니다.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch palette/add-aria-hidden-to-icons-17874831167615438461

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head b7704e6b7f1c3adb7eae3461b1039ba43f7ce6ee.

• Head SHA: b7704e6b7f1c3adb7eae3461b1039ba43f7ce6ee

• Workflow run: 31091868185

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: b7704e6b7f1c3adb7eae3461b1039ba43f7ce6ee
• Workflow run: 31091868185
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head b7704e6b7f1c3adb7eae3461b1039ba43f7ce6ee.

• Head SHA: b7704e6b7f1c3adb7eae3461b1039ba43f7ce6ee

• Workflow run: 31091868185

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading